2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2023.107821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporating machine learning models and remote sensing to assess the spatial distribution of saturated hydraulic conductivity in a light-textured soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prediction of irrigation WY was accomplished using ANN and RF algorithms, along with auxiliary variables such as topographic attributes, remotely sensed indices, and soil variables. We chose these algorithms due to their success in digital soil mapping, as demonstrated in previous studies ( Saeed et al., 2017 ; Rostaminia et al., 2021 ; Rezaei et al., 2023 ). More detailed information about the performance of utilized ML algorithms is given below.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The prediction of irrigation WY was accomplished using ANN and RF algorithms, along with auxiliary variables such as topographic attributes, remotely sensed indices, and soil variables. We chose these algorithms due to their success in digital soil mapping, as demonstrated in previous studies ( Saeed et al., 2017 ; Rostaminia et al., 2021 ; Rezaei et al., 2023 ). More detailed information about the performance of utilized ML algorithms is given below.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where, a i and b i are the observed and predicted values, and , are the average of the observed and predicted values, r is the correlation coefficient between the observed and predicted values, and , and are the variance of the observed and predicted values. To assess the accuracy of the results and model performances, the Kruskal–Wallis (KW) test was used to identify any statistically significant differences in performance among MLAs ( Demir and Citakoglu, 2023 ; Rezaei et al., 2023 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where, a i and b i are the observed and predicted values, a and b, are the average of the observed and predicted values, r is the correlation coefficient between the observed and predicted values, and ∂ a , and ∂ b are the variance of the observed and predicted values. To assess the accuracy of the results and model performances, the Kruskal-Wallis (KW) test was used to identify any statistically significant differences in performance among MLAs (Demir and Citakoglu, 2023;Rezaei et al, 2023).…”
Section: Model Validation and Uncertainty Analysis 261 Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RF models leverage an ensemble of decision trees to make robust predictions, while ANNs models simulate the interconnectedness of neurons in the human brain to capture complex relationships . These algorithms have been successfully applied in various agricultural contexts, such as digital soil mapping (Rostaminia et al, 2021;Mousavi et al, 2022;Khosravani et al, 2023;Rezaei et al, 2023), showcasing their effectiveness in predicting crop yields based on environmental factors and soil properties (Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2020;Basir et al, 2021). As regards, Boori et al (2023) indicate that the rapid advances in satellite technologies and MLAs, particularly ANNs, have the potential to offer affordable and comprehensive solutions for accurate grain prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%