Incorporating Population-Level Variability in Orthopedic Biomechanical Analysis: A Review

Abstract

Effectively addressing population-level variability within orthopedic analyses requires robust data sets that span the target population and can be greatly facilitated by statistical methods for incorporating such data into functional biomechanical models. Data sets continue to be disseminated that include not just anatomical information but also key mechanical data including tissue or joint stiffness, gait patterns, and other inputs relevant to analysis of joint function across a range of anatomies and physiologies. Statistical modeling can be used to establish correlations between a variety of structural and functional biometrics rooted in these data and to quantify how these correlations change from health to disease and, finally, to joint reconstruction or other clinical intervention. Principal component analysis provides a basis for effectively and efficiently integrating variability in anatomy, tissue properties, joint kinetics, and kinematics into mechanistic models of joint function. With such models, bioengineers are able to study the effects of variability on biomechanical performance, not just on a patient-specific basis but in a way that may be predictive of a larger patient population. The goal of this paper is to demonstrate the broad use of statistical modeling within orthopedics and to discuss ways to continue to leverage these techniques to improve biomechanical understanding of orthopedic systems across populations.

Automated finite element meshing of the lumbar spine: Verification and validation with 18 specimen-specific models

“…Ideally mesh convergence would be performed on every model produced, but that is usually not practical. Choosing a representative model for convergence is consistent with the methods of other automated modeling techniques in the literature (Bischoff et al, 2014;Galloway et al, 2013).…”

Men and women have similarly shaped carpometacarpal joint bones

“…To investigate pure-shape differences in the trapezia and 1 st metacarpal bones between men and women, a general Procrustes analysis (least-squares minimization of correspondent point differences) was performed on the fitted meshes to filter out scaling variations (Bischoff et al, 2013; Ross, 2004; Stegmann and Gomez, 2002) producing the size-normalized shape model.…”

“…This is effective for understanding morphology (Bischoff et al, 2013; Vos et al, 2004) and for determining relationships between morphology and parameters of interest, such as sex and age (Anderson et al, 2010; Bischoff et al, 2013; Fitzpatrick et al, 2011). Furthermore, statistical shape models allow us to investigate specific anatomical regions and examine local shape changes, which can be correlated to parameters of interest or anatomical features, such as ligament or tendon attachment sites.…”

A statistical geometrical description of the human liver for probabilistic occupant models

“…Statistical shape models (SSMs) have been shown to be valuable investigation tools into the variation in anatomical shapes (Barratt et al, 2008;Bischoff et al, 2014;Bredbenner et al, 2010;Chen and Shapiro, 2009;Davies et al, 2008;van de Giessen et al, 2010). SSMs of the abdominal organs could be used for the investigation of the organ variations for medical treatments (Okada et al, 2007;Reyes et al, 2010) and could also be applied to the development of computational probabilistic finite element (FE) models Untaroiu et al, 2012).…”