Incorporating Service Quality into Yardstick Regulation: An Application to the Peru Water Sector

Abstract

Yardstick regulation requires the utilization of benchmarking, a valuable tool for improving public service delivery, especially in developing countries where inefficiencies translate into negative health impacts and social unrest. However, benchmarking must account for both the cost and the quality of service. Using data from 38 Peruvian water utilities (1996 to 2001), the paper evaluates quality-incorporated firm performance and identifies changes in efficiency, technology (frontier), and service quality. The study utilizes the nonparametric data envelopment analysis (DEA) model, a preference structure model, and the quality-incorporated Malmquist productivity index in evaluating firm performance; the study discusses their implications for regulating state-owned enterprises.JEL Classification: K23, L51, L95

Are Public-Private Partnerships a Source of Greater Efficiency in Water Supply? Results of a Non-Parametric Performance Analysis Relating to the Italian Industry

“…In the last twenty years, several papers more specifically focusing on the water provision industry have been published [31,[51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69]. Cooper et al [70] offer a systematic introduction to DEA and the different models used for evaluating efficiency in a variety of contexts.…”

Exploring and analysing sources of technical efficiency in water supply services: Some evidence from Southeast Asian public water utilities

“…Hence, an increase in temperature will lead to higher water supply costs for water utilities. A similar conclusion was made by Faust and Baranzini [22] using a sample of 141 Swiss water utilities from 2002 to 2009. f) Chlorine tests: Chlorine tests are often used as chemical quality standard indicators in many empirical studies [28,29]. It is calculated by utilising the water samples that pass the chemical quality standards proportionate to a total number of water samples taken during the year.…”

Operating Cost Coverage vs. Water Utility Complaints

“…Considering that there are several socio-cultural factors that may result in higher rates of complaints for goods and services [49][50][51], it is risky to assume any generalization, considering that there are also countries with much fewer data but result in no or opposite sign correlation. It should be emphasized that complaints are negatively related to service quality and efficiency, and whenever possible it is important to study relations among both people's perceptions of quality and actual chemical/technical quality [7,52].…”