2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.03.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporating Site-less Clinical Trials Into Drug Development: A Framework for Action

Abstract: Site-less CROs offer a working example of how remote technologies and in-home monitoring methods can address shortcomings of conventional drug development. This model maximizes time and cost, as well as potentially earlier identification of adverse events. Coordinated communication among investigators, sponsors, regulators, and patients will be needed to develop standardized strategies for incorporating site-less CROs into current and future study design.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Novel trial designs may provide more appropriate data, while also improving patient access; for example, pragmatic trials which are designed to show patient-relevant effectiveness of an intervention in broad patient groups, reflecting the population and management strategies in real-world practice [71]. Additionally, the use of technology, ranging from simple telephone contact, through web and smartphone tools and medical-grade wearable sensors to collect real-world data in home settings has the potential to reduce the costs, inconvenience, and labour associated with regular clinic attendance required during trials [72]. Such tactics may prove particularly beneficial for improving patient inclusion and robustness of data in rare diseases, such as MPN, where specialists are thinly spread and geographic proximity to trial centres is an issue.…”
Section: Regional Variability In Access To Clinical Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Novel trial designs may provide more appropriate data, while also improving patient access; for example, pragmatic trials which are designed to show patient-relevant effectiveness of an intervention in broad patient groups, reflecting the population and management strategies in real-world practice [71]. Additionally, the use of technology, ranging from simple telephone contact, through web and smartphone tools and medical-grade wearable sensors to collect real-world data in home settings has the potential to reduce the costs, inconvenience, and labour associated with regular clinic attendance required during trials [72]. Such tactics may prove particularly beneficial for improving patient inclusion and robustness of data in rare diseases, such as MPN, where specialists are thinly spread and geographic proximity to trial centres is an issue.…”
Section: Regional Variability In Access To Clinical Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, other biologic data could easily be obtained from a second VAMS device (another 10 μL of blood), including DNA samples for genomic sequencing of the host or blood-borne pathogens. Such methods are likely to be increasingly used in clinical trials in remote and rural areas, as well as newer "siteless" clinical trials [39,40].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Study drug adherence can be monitored using a combination of telemedicine visits to talk with patients and preaddressed shipping containers provided to participants to send unused study drug back to the study site for drug accountability. 40 In some cases, intravenous infusions could be done remotely by means of home infusion companies or at local infusion centers. Careful coordination of all these activities is required to preserve the safety of the participants and comply with federal and local regulations.…”
Section: Study Drug Supply Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People with ALS typically have limited mobility, or fatigue easily, or both, and travel to an ALS Center can be challenging even for those Abbreviations: ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; ALSAQ- 40 who live nearby. Some patients may not have the financial resources or the necessary equipment or supplies (accessible vans, power chairs, necessary personnel) for safe travel to a major ALS center.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%