Incorporating Socioeconomic Metrics in Civil Engineering Projects: The Resilience Perspective

Abstract

This paper explores the role of socioeconomic metrics in the design, planning and operations of civil engineering projects within the specific context of resilience. The inclusion of resilience analysis and design is consistent with the goals of the ASCE Infrastructure Resilience Division (IRD) and related emerging standards and duties of civil engineers. This paper focuses on the practices in design, planning, construction, and operation of civil engineering projects that can deliver social value to communities and offers a set of socioeconomic metrics for consistently measuring these benefits. Socioeconomic metrics benchmark benefits including safety, social equity, health and wellbeing, prosperity, cohesion and inclusivity, and mobility and accessibility during the whole life-cycle of a project. A review of metrics is presented and expanded with an emphasis on the need for contextual narrative support to their application. The aim is to establish further the use of metrics in civil engineering projects to set values at the community level and formulate them to justify and rationalize resilience interventions and strategies. The reviewed concepts and categorized project metrics can be used by a range of actors in addition to civil engineers, such as urban planners, policy makers, or regional developers, preferably in a collaborative manner across these groups, particularly to help prioritize the investment of resources and funds to achieve resilience. Three project examples at differing levels of complexity are presented to conceptually illustrate the approaches outlined herein.

Different journeys, same struggle: Practitioner experiences in environmental justice policy, assessment, and decision-making

“…Paradoxically, while there is a large reliance on quantitative performance measures in tracking equity and EJ in transportation planning, many state and regional transportation agencies still acknowledge data availability and disaggregation as a constraint on effectively carrying out such analysis (Barajas et al, 2022). In short, lagging advances in technical approaches like long-range transportation planning may undermine the rapid advance in goals to incorporate measures like EJ and other social impact priorities in transportation plans, but methodological discussions should not overtake the focus of addressing contextually speci c distributive concerns and mitigating unintended consequences (Field et al, 2022;Handy, 2008;Martens, 2011).…”

Unveiling the Impact of Communication Network on Engineering Project Team Performance: The Interplay of Centralization and Tie Strength

“…Enhancing the resilience of engineering project teams is a crucial pathway to improve team performance. 11 , 12 A recent study investigates the impact of social interaction patterns on team resilience under conditions of turbulence and complexity, 13 and it is well-established that social interaction patterns serve as the foundation for shaping communication network structures. 14 , 15 In this way, we propose that optimizing communication network emerges as an indispensable strategy for fostering effective knowledge sharing and enhancing team resilience, ultimately leading to the improvement of team performance.…”