2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-84186-7_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporating Translation Quality Estimation into Chinese-Korean Neural Machine Translation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The advancement of ancient Korean translation based on machine-translation would improve the productivity of current classical translators and expedite the process [7]. In the process of machine learning known as feature extraction, relevant input data is chosen and transformed to provide useful features that may be used to train a model [8]. The application of machine translation technology to assess the quality of Korean translations produced by computers or translation software is known as machine Korean Translation Grading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advancement of ancient Korean translation based on machine-translation would improve the productivity of current classical translators and expedite the process [7]. In the process of machine learning known as feature extraction, relevant input data is chosen and transformed to provide useful features that may be used to train a model [8]. The application of machine translation technology to assess the quality of Korean translations produced by computers or translation software is known as machine Korean Translation Grading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a fundamental technique for various tasks and has been successfully applied in many areas of natural language processing. For example, reading comprehension [1], question and answer systems [2], and machine translation [3]. In machine reading comprehension tasks, the correct answer can be selected by semantic matching between the context and the question.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%