2012
DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2012.690881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporating uncertainty in hydrological predictions for gauged and ungauged basins in southern Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
70
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences between the spatial distributions of the sensitivities between the two indices highlight that applying SA to different model outputs can generate different levels of sensitivities for each parameter. In addition, the choice of objective function or model output for which to measure parameter sensitivity is important, as parameter sensitivities will differ depending on whether a user is evaluating measures of magnitude, the variability of distribution, or timing (Krause et al, 2005;Kapangaziwiri et al, 2012). Figure 5 illustrates the variability of parameter sensitivities between NHDPlus regions R08 (lower Mississippi) and R14 (upper Colorado) (see Fig.…”
Section: Parameter Sensitivitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences between the spatial distributions of the sensitivities between the two indices highlight that applying SA to different model outputs can generate different levels of sensitivities for each parameter. In addition, the choice of objective function or model output for which to measure parameter sensitivity is important, as parameter sensitivities will differ depending on whether a user is evaluating measures of magnitude, the variability of distribution, or timing (Krause et al, 2005;Kapangaziwiri et al, 2012). Figure 5 illustrates the variability of parameter sensitivities between NHDPlus regions R08 (lower Mississippi) and R14 (upper Colorado) (see Fig.…”
Section: Parameter Sensitivitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McIntyre et al (2005) presented a GLUE-type approach consisting of transferring ensembles of parameter sets obtained on donor (gauged) catchments to target (ungauged) catchments. More recently, a framework based on constrained parameter sets was applied in several studies (Yadav et al, 2007;Zhang et al, 2008;Winsemius et al, 2009;Kapangaziwiri et al, 2012). It is a two-step procedure.…”
Section: Predicting Streamflow In Ungauged Catchments With Uncertaintmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Zhang et al (2008), imposed a set of three constraints to infer the runoff characteristics of catchments, following the concept of regionalization of hydrological signatures (initially developed by Yadav et al, 2007). Recently, Kapangaziwiri et al (2012) constrained the Pitman monthly rainfall runoff model (Hughes et al, 2006) based on a regionalization of runoff signatures. Perrin et al (2008) proposed a method called discrete parameterization based on the use of parameter sets compiled a priori via calibration to other catchments.…”
Section: S Gharari Et Al: Constraint-based Parameter Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%