1999
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.1999.6305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporation of Aggregate Breakup in the Simulation of Orthokinetic Coagulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A summary of different fragmentation patterns proposed so far was given by Kim and Kramer (2007). Examples include the binary pattern (two fragments with a specific mass ratio; Spicer & Pratsinis, 1996), the normal pattern (a normal distribution of the fragments; Coulaloglou & Tavlarides, 1977;Spicer & Pratsinis, 1996), and the random pattern (random fragments; Kramer & Clark, 1999). Because the exact fragmentation pattern of a soot aggregate is not well known, as a first start, we examined in this study the binary pattern, which is the easiest one to implement and has been commonly used in aggregate fragmentation modeling (Spicer & Pratsinis, 1996).…”
Section: Oxidation-driven Soot Aggregate Fragmentation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A summary of different fragmentation patterns proposed so far was given by Kim and Kramer (2007). Examples include the binary pattern (two fragments with a specific mass ratio; Spicer & Pratsinis, 1996), the normal pattern (a normal distribution of the fragments; Coulaloglou & Tavlarides, 1977;Spicer & Pratsinis, 1996), and the random pattern (random fragments; Kramer & Clark, 1999). Because the exact fragmentation pattern of a soot aggregate is not well known, as a first start, we examined in this study the binary pattern, which is the easiest one to implement and has been commonly used in aggregate fragmentation modeling (Spicer & Pratsinis, 1996).…”
Section: Oxidation-driven Soot Aggregate Fragmentation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting from the same basic considerations, but using a simpliÿed approach, Kramer and Clark (1999) developed another hydrodynamic breakage model for solid aggregates. They classiÿed failure modes by deÿning manifestation, induction and location of the failure, and stated that aggregates break when the maximum eigenvalue of the stress tensor is greater than the aggregate strength ( f ).…”
Section: Breakagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrodynamic shear is employed in most flocculation system in order to assure a high collision frequency between particles for a rapid particle size growth [1,2]. However, if the agitation is too vigorous, the shear stress will be beyond the floc strength, which will break large flocs to small ones [3,4]. Since individual particles experienced different interactions, breakage is often random for particles of all sizes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The breakage kernel is the rate coefficient for breakage, and breakage daughter distribution function defines the probability distribution by fragmentation. Breakage kernel is commonly considered as a power law function of the shear rate, G, and the aggregate size l [3,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%