Incorporation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Point Cloud Products into Remote Sensing Evapotranspiration Models

Abstract

In recent years, the deployment of satellites and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) has led to production of enormous amounts of data and to novel data processing and analysis techniques for monitoring crop conditions. One overlooked data source amid these efforts, however, is incorporation of 3D information derived from multi-spectral imagery and photogrammetry algorithms into crop monitoring algorithms. Few studies and algorithms have taken advantage of 3D UAV information in monitoring and assessment of plant conditions. In this study, different aspects of UAV point cloud information for enhancing remote sensing evapotranspiration (ET) models, particularly the Two-Source Energy Balance Model (TSEB), over a commercial vineyard located in California are presented. Toward this end, an innovative algorithm called Vegetation Structural-Spectral Information eXtraction Algorithm (VSSIXA) has been developed. This algorithm is able to accurately estimate height, volume, surface area, and projected surface area of the plant canopy solely based on point cloud information. In addition to biomass information, it can add multi-spectral UAV information to point clouds and provide spectral-structural canopy properties. The biomass information is used to assess its relationship with in situ Leaf Area Index (LAI), which is a crucial input for ET models. In addition, instead of using nominal field values of plant parameters, spatial information of fractional cover, canopy height, and canopy width are input to the TSEB model. Therefore, the two main objectives for incorporating point cloud information into remote sensing ET models for this study are to (1) evaluate the possible improvement in the estimation of LAI and biomass parameters from point cloud information in order to create robust LAI maps at the model resolution and (2) assess the sensitivity of the TSEB model to using average/nominal values versus spatially-distributed canopy fractional cover, height, and width information derived from point cloud data. The proposed algorithm is tested on imagery from the Utah State University AggieAir sUAS Program as part of the ARS-USDA GRAPEX Project (Grape Remote sensing Atmospheric Profile and Evapotranspiration Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 50 2 of 34 eXperiment) collected since 2014 over multiple vineyards located in California. The results indicate a robust relationship between in situ LAI measurements and estimated biomass parameters from the point cloud data, and improvement in the agreement between TSEB model output of ET with tower measurements when employing LAI and spatially-distributed canopy structure parameters derived from the point cloud data.Evapotranspiration (ET) is one of the key components in water and energy cycles, and its quantification is essential to increasing crop water use efficiency [1]. However, estimation of ET using physically-based models is not a straightforward process due to input requirements and model complexity [2]. The degree of complexity increases with non-homogeneous landscapes where both soil and ...

Automatic Grapevine Trunk Detection on UAV-Based Point Cloud

“…Additionally, to the geometry, each 3D point also stored the colour which was used to discriminate between vegetation and bare soil. Aboutalebi et al [26] used UAV-based 3D information to monitor and assess vineyard plant's condition. Different aspects of 3D point cloud were used to estimate height, volume, surface area, and projected surface area of plant's canopy.…”

The Unmanned Systems Research Laboratory (USRL): A New Facility for UAV-Based Atmospheric Observations

“…UAS have the great potential to complement relatively low-cost ground-based measurements with an airborne in-situ component and contribute to various diverse atmospheric applications, especially over regions where surface measurements are impossible or hard to perform on a regular basis, for example over oceans. Some of them deal with (1) the calibration/validation of lidar and satellite aerosol products, e.g., of the Aerosol, Clouds and Trace Gases Research Infrastructure (ACTRIS, http:/actris.net/, accessed on 5 May 2021), (2) in-situ cloud sensing [12], (3) the representation of groundbased observations (e.g., of new particle formation [13]), ( 4) the mapping of ground-based emissions for Integrated Carbon Observation System (ICOS), and ( 5) the detection and mapping of air pollution episodes. UAS can also be valuable tools for hyperspectral or multispectral monitoring of ecosystems and hence contribute to the understanding of land-atmosphere interactions [14].…”

“…Although a number of routine balloon-borne measurements (e.g., based on radiosondes and ozonesondes) already take place, most airborne measurements are sporadic and campaign-based, and do not meet the needs of long-term monitoring of the upper levels of the atmosphere. Recent developments, mostly in aerosol technology, allowed for in-situ airborne atmospheric observations conducted with sensors on-board Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) [6][7][8][9][10][11][12], as described in Table 1.…”

A Decade of Unmanned Aerial Systems in Irrigated Agriculture in the Western U.S.

“…A selected list of efforts are mentioned here: a) Landsat-UAV data harmonization (Aboutalebi et al, 2018b) to evaluate potential biases on UAV information and direct comparison to Landsat satellite products; b) Atmospheric impact on UAS thermal information (Torres-Rua, 2017), to address atmospheric conditions with the advent of stronger UAVs (e.g. BVLOS); c) UAV optical and thermal spectral and spatial uncertainty impact (McKee et al, 2018) to evaluate potential issues caused by spectral and location biases towards estimation of evapotranspiration; d) Shadow impact on UAS optical and thermal products (Aboutalebi et al, 2019a), to evaluate shadow effect in orchards and vineyards on vegetation indices, to biomass and surface energy balance; e) Estimation of energy balance fluxes for vineyards crops using UAS (Nieto et al, 2015;Nieto et al, 2019), an adaptation of the TSEB approach to the uniqueness of vine orchards; f) Soil water estimation using UAS (Hassan-Esfahani et al, 2015), application of machine learning approaches for soil water content; g)Yield and biomass estimation using UAS (Aboutalebi et al, 2018a); h) use of point cloud in estimation of evapotranspiration (Aboutalebi et al, 2020); and i) Pixel size impact on the estimation of ET using UAV (Nassar et al, 2020), to assess the changes in ET estimation accuracy for energy balance and ET with fine and coarser pixels. These studies, along with other researchers (Kustas et al, 2018), provide the necessary support for additional UAV development such as use of beyond line of sight UAVs and drone swarm, real-time agricultural applications, and integration of UAV and satellite information for agriculture.…”