2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.aorn.2011.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increase in Sharps Injuries in Surgical Settings Versus Nonsurgical Settings After Passage of National Needlestick Legislation

Abstract: Despite legislation and advances in sharps safety technology, surgical injuries continued to increase during the period that nonsurgical injuries decreased significantly. Hospitals should comply with requirements for the adoption of safer surgical technologies, and promote policies and practices shown to substantially reduce blood exposures to surgeons, their coworkers, and patients. Although decisions affecting the safety of the surgical team lie primarily in the surgeon's hands, there are also roles for admi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
60
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a large workforce engaged in direct care that involves repetitive lifting, turning, and transferring patients as well as injecting medication and inserting intravenous lines, it is easy to appreciate the hazards that nurses face every shift that they work. Despite the variation in national policy, hospital regulation, and health system sophistication, occupational injuries persist among healthcare workers (Griffith, 2013;Jagger et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a large workforce engaged in direct care that involves repetitive lifting, turning, and transferring patients as well as injecting medication and inserting intravenous lines, it is easy to appreciate the hazards that nurses face every shift that they work. Despite the variation in national policy, hospital regulation, and health system sophistication, occupational injuries persist among healthcare workers (Griffith, 2013;Jagger et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The risks for sharps injuries arise because surgical procedures are often blood intensive, involve manipulation of sharp instruments, and require highly coordinated interactions between members of the surgical team. 5 The unique microsurgical nature of ophthalmic practice presents further risks for sustaining sharps injuries. 6 There is an increased likelihood of instrument mishandling due to the use of fine instruments and sutures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on reports from departments outside the operating room in 87 hospitals, PI rates were found to have decreased by 31.6% between 2006 and 2001. (20) Safety devices can be active or passive. Passive devices do not require actions from users; instead, their sharp points are automatically covered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%