2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased aggressive motivation towards formidable opponents: evidence of a novel form of mutual assessment

Abstract: Contests are largely driven by resource value, but their outcome also depends on asymmetries in fighting ability between contestants. Consequently, individuals benefit from assessing these asymmetries when deciding to engage opponents or retreat. Yet, there is much about these assessments that we do not know. First, it is often difficult to discriminate if individuals only assess their own fighting ability or if they compare it to that of their opponents by mutual assessment. Second, the extent to which assess… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The marble landed in the water surface from a 10 cm height and invoked a startle response in focal animals via visual and mechanosensory cues from the distinct splash ( Fig. 2a [36][37][38][39];). This probe was performed twice during contests, at 5 min after onset of contests and again at 5 min after focal fish resumed interaction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The marble landed in the water surface from a 10 cm height and invoked a startle response in focal animals via visual and mechanosensory cues from the distinct splash ( Fig. 2a [36][37][38][39];). This probe was performed twice during contests, at 5 min after onset of contests and again at 5 min after focal fish resumed interaction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a 72-h acclimation to laboratory conditions, measures of size were recorded for all fish to be used as estimates of RHP (see review by Arnott and Elwood [ 7 ]). First, the wet weight of each fish was calculated by the difference in mass between a water-filled container with and without the fish (cf Kareklas et al [ 36 ]). Then fish were briefly removed from the container and placed with some water on a prepared waterproof surface marked by 1 cm squares.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations