Increased Australian outpatient private practice psychiatric care during the COVID-19 pandemic: usage of new MBS-telehealth item and face-to-face psychiatrist office-based services in Quarter 3, 2020

Abstract

Objective: The Australian federal government introduced new COVID-19 psychiatrist Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) telehealth items to assist with providing private specialist care. We investigate private psychiatrists’ uptake of video and telephone telehealth, as well as total (telehealth and face-to-face) consultations for Quarter 3 (July–September), 2020. We compare these to the same quarter in 2019. Method: MBS-item service data were extracted for COVID-19-psychiatrist video and telephone telehealth item numbers and compared with Quarter 3 (July–September), 2019, of face-to-face consultations for the whole of Australia. Results: The number of psychiatry consultations (telehealth and face-to-face) rose during the first wave of the pandemic in Quarter 3, 2020, by 14% compared to Quarter 3, 2019, with telehealth 43% of this total. Face-to-face consultations in Quarter 3, 2020 were only 64% of the comparative number of Quarter 3, 2019 consultations. Most telehealth involved short telephone consultations of ⩽15–30 min. Video consultations comprised 42% of total telehealth provision: these were for new patient assessments and longer consultations. These figures represent increased face-to-face consultation compared to Quarter 2, 2020, with substantial maintenance of telehealth consultations. Conclusions: Private psychiatrists continued using the new COVID-19 MBS telehealth items for Quarter 3, 2020 to increase the number of patient care contacts in the context of decreased face-to-face consultations compared to 2019, but increased face-to-face consultations compared to Quarter 2, 2020.

Health policy experts’ perspectives on implementing mental health specialist video consultations in routine primary care – a qualitative interview study

“…Consequently, the expansion to more video supported treatment was relatively seamless [56,57]. In Australia, by quickly adapting reimbursements schemes, providers and patients rapidly adopted mental health specialists video consultations and the number of video supported psychological or psychiatric sessions increased sharply [58,59]. However, since most health care systems were not prepared for this emergency, legal and regulatory frameworks and reimbursements schemes have often been changed without the usual path of consensus building within regulatory and legislative authorities [60][61][62].…”

Is there a missing-middle in Australian mental health care?

“…5 In particular, private outpatient and inpatient psychiatric services provide a substantive amount of care, especially for patients with mood disorders and substance abuse, and have done so, on an ongoing basis, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. 9,10 Similarly, in the case of moderate mental illness, Orygen makes an unsubstantiated assertion that Medicare-subsidised mental health services are insufficient without any documentary proof. Attempts to quantify the number of people on waiting lists, or whose treatment was prematurely ended, are confined to surveys of people attending headspace, while the number of people not receiving the appropriate complexity of care was estimated from headspace treatment failures.…”

The productivity commission report on mental health: Recommendations with negative consequences for clinical care in public and private sectors

“…This cap is based on data for limited, ruralregional psychiatrist MBS-telehealthitems from 2019, an invalid baseline comparator for geographically unrestricted COVID-19-telehealth-psychiatrist-MBS-Items. In April-September 2020, psychiatrists provided expanded care using the new telehealth items, with up to a 14% increase in overall services compared to 2019 (Looi et al, 2021). Furthermore, patients may prefer telehealth consultations for privacy, convenience and the opportunity costs in travelling to appointments (Guinart et al, 2020).…”