2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-013-1651-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased availability of phosphorus after drying and rewetting of a grassland soil: processes and plant use

Abstract: Aims Drying and rewetting (DRW) often increases soil phosphorus (P) availability. Our aims were to elucidate underlying processes and assess potential plant uptake of released P. Methods Using a grassland soil with low available and high microbial P as a model, we studied the contributions of microbial and physicochemical processes to P release by determining DRW effects on i) C:P ratios of nutrient pulses in fresh and sterilized soils, ii) aggregate stability and iii) P forms released upon soil dispersion. Us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
58
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, we observed a positive relation between DOP net release and MBC, similar to findings of Turner and Haygarth (2001) for grassland soils. The dominance of DIP over DOP can be explained by the mineralization of released DOP during the 2.5 h extraction procedure, as the mineralization of organic P in soil is very fast and can be substantial at time scales of less than 2 h ( Macklon et al, 1997; Fransson and Jones , 2007; Bünemann et al, 2013). Thus, it seems likely that the net release of DIP exceeded the net release of DOP due to a high phosphatase activity that converted initially released DOP into DIP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, we observed a positive relation between DOP net release and MBC, similar to findings of Turner and Haygarth (2001) for grassland soils. The dominance of DIP over DOP can be explained by the mineralization of released DOP during the 2.5 h extraction procedure, as the mineralization of organic P in soil is very fast and can be substantial at time scales of less than 2 h ( Macklon et al, 1997; Fransson and Jones , 2007; Bünemann et al, 2013). Thus, it seems likely that the net release of DIP exceeded the net release of DOP due to a high phosphatase activity that converted initially released DOP into DIP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for the release of P after D/W are seen in the lysis of microbial cells after rewetting, leading to the release of P rich cell components and the disruption of aggregates, exposing occluded organic and inorganic P ( Turner and Haygarth , 2001; Turner et al, 2003; Butterly et al, 2009). Bünemann et al (2013) showed that microbial biomass in grassland soils was the original source of C and P release after D/W, while the physicochemical processes, such as the disruption of soil aggregates, also played an important role for the release of P. Yet, little is known about P release due to D/W in forest soils. Achat et al (2012) observed a P release caused by D/W in forest soils.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, water soluble P was much higher for the LUE AE horizon than for the other samples. This high value can be explained by the release of microbial P following drying before analysis and subsequent rewetting during analysis (Bünemann et al 2013). This indicates the high relevance of the microbial pool for the storage of P at the P-poor site LUE, which is in agreement with the metagenomics and NMR data discussed above.…”
Section: Phosphorus Mobilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When rewetting a dried soil, a pulse of solute N and P has often been observed (Borken and Matzner, 2009;Butterly et al, 2009Butterly et al, , 2011Achat et al, 2012;Dinh et al, 2016). With the degree of drying the release of nutrients after rewetting increased (Bü nemann et al, 2013). The release from the soil solid phase after D/W might influence the availability of the nutrients for other processes, like root uptake or leaching, depending on the duration of the D/W effect (Butterly et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%