Increased Bridging Characteristics in Social Networks are Associated with Increasing Amygdala Volume and Grey Matter Density

Abstract

BackgroundSocial connectedness has been linked to decreased rates of cognitive decline particularly among older adults (Fratiglioni et al., 2004). Several studies have demonstrated that access to an expansive network of diverse, and loosely connected individuals (i.e., social bridging) plays a particularly unique role in conferring resilience against cognitive decline (Perry et al., 2021). We explored the association of social bridging with cortical atrophy measured by gray matter density (GMD) in cognitively normal (CN), subjective cognitive decline (SCD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) participants from the Social Networks and Alzheimer’s Disease (SNAD) at the Indiana Alzheimer Disease Research Center.Method:We analyzed baseline data of 176 SNAD participants (63 CN, 54 SCD, 47 MCI, 12 AD). Social bridging metrics were collected via in‐person interviews of egocentric social network data. MCI and AD were combined into a cognitively impaired group, resulting in 3 diagnostic groups (CN, SCD, CI). Demographic and biomarker differences across groups were analyzed using ANOVA. Pooled linear regressions were run with ROIs as the dependent variables and diagnosis, age, sex, education, and social bridging as regressors. A voxel‐wise multiple linear regression of GMD images in SPM12 yielded statistical maps across the pooled sample.ResultTable 1 shows the demographic and biomarker comparisons of all groups. The linear regression showed greater social bridging was associated with larger left and right amygdala volume (both p=0.01), and trending larger left frontal thickness (p=0.055), and left and right insula thickness (both p=0.09). Figure 1 and Figure 2 show scatterplot distribution of significant and trending brain regions versus bridging by diagnostic group with regression p‐values and lines. Statistical maps show increasing social bridging is associated with increasing GMD lateralized to the left hemisphere with a frontotemporoparietal pattern (Figure 3).ConclusionWe found that the effects of particular social enrichment on GMD, such as social bridging, are localized to regions primarily involving motivation and emotion. The left lateralization suggests this hemisphere’s propensity for protection against cognitive decline via social mechanisms. Future work should investigate potential associations between social bridging and amyloid and tau deposition.