2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased cortical cerebral blood flow with LUCAS; a new device for mechanical chest compressions compared to standard external compressions during experimental cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
75
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
75
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning pig models, certain authors have reported that mechanical chest compression, whatever the device, provides better coronary and thus myocardial perfusion and a greater probability of ROSC [22,23]. The same conclusions have been drawn in studies on cerebral perfusion or on cerebral blood low, and perfusion pressures recorded in the internal carotid were greater with mechanical methods than with the manual method [24]. In a pig model, blood low recorded in the left internal carotid was signi icantly greater with LUCAS ® than with manual CPR [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Concerning pig models, certain authors have reported that mechanical chest compression, whatever the device, provides better coronary and thus myocardial perfusion and a greater probability of ROSC [22,23]. The same conclusions have been drawn in studies on cerebral perfusion or on cerebral blood low, and perfusion pressures recorded in the internal carotid were greater with mechanical methods than with the manual method [24]. In a pig model, blood low recorded in the left internal carotid was signi icantly greater with LUCAS ® than with manual CPR [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The relatively higher survival rate in studies II and III in comparison with the above studies might also be related to the improved quality of chest compressions that were performed with the LUCAS device. It was demonstrated in our group that chest compressions with the LUCAS device during experimental resuscitation resulted in higher cerebral blood flow and cardiac output than standard manual external chest compressions [165]. In animal studies, superior survival rates with drugs have been demonstrated in comparison with humans, probably due to the fact that drug administration occurs some 10 min earlier in humans than in animal studies [166].…”
Section: The Experimental Model Of Cprmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…(9) The other commonly used mechanical CPR device is the LUCAS (Lund University Cardiopulmonary Assist System; Jolife AB, Lund, Sweden), which has been tested in laboratory-based animal and human experiments. (10)(11)(12) These studies demonstrated higher cardiac output, carotid artery blood fl ow, end-tidal carbon dioxide, aortic and coronary perfusion pressures, and ROSC rates with mechanical rather than manual CPR, although both were initiated at about the same time. The LUCAS device has also been used effectively during performance of advanced resuscitation techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%