2014
DOI: 10.1111/acer.12368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased Cut‐Point of the TACER‐3 Screen Reduces False Positives Without Losing Sensitivity in Predicting Risk Alcohol Drinking in Pregnancy

Abstract: Thus, the TACER-3 was more effective at selectively identifying women drinking at fetal risk levels than the original T-ACE. The TACER-3 allows for more efficient use of healthcare provider time in directing targeted clinical interventions with pregnant women identified as drinking at fetal risk levels.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
11
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasing the cut-off to 3 points resulted in greater specificity (decreased false positives, which can be time consuming for the clinician to further investigate) while maintaining sensitivity, and was also more effective in identifying women whose children had FASD. 44 …”
Section: Screening For Auds During Pregnancymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing the cut-off to 3 points resulted in greater specificity (decreased false positives, which can be time consuming for the clinician to further investigate) while maintaining sensitivity, and was also more effective in identifying women whose children had FASD. 44 …”
Section: Screening For Auds During Pregnancymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shortness of the test (takes less than 1 min to ask) and the fact that any score than 0 is considered positive (0/1 easy scoring) make it an attractive instrument to identify potential pregnant risk drinkers. More recently, an updated version of the test (TACER‐3) has been proposed and validated . Questions and scoring of the test are shown in Table ; further information about the test is available at the following address: https://pubs.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/arh25-3/204-209.htm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessing the mother's alcohol consumption habits during gestation could be complicated as the admission of alcohol drinking during gestation may be accompanied by heavy guilt feelings. To overcome these difficulties, specific screening instruments for pregnant women have been developed: Indeed, the Tolerance‐Worried‐Eye opener‐Amnesia‐(K)Cut down (TWEAK), the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test–Consumption (AUDIT‐C), the T‐ACE/TACER‐3, and the examination of food habits in the diet are commonly used by FASD experts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The American College of Obstetrics & Gynecology (2006) currently recommends a cut-point of 2 for the total T-ACE score which maximizes sensitivity in identifying women drinking at any level (Sokol et al, 2003). We had demonstrated previously that a total score cut-point of 3 or more rather than 2 or more on the T-ACE (i.e., the “TACER-3” screen), improved prediction of which pregnant women were consuming higher levels of alcohol, reduced “false positives” in detecting at-risk drinking, and improved prediction of alcohol-related neurobehavioral outcomes in children (Chiodo et al, 2009; 2010; 2014). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%