2000
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2000)126:4(530)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased Damping in Cantilevered Traffic Signal Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Truck-induced wind gusts are the result of large vehicles passing beneath the signal support structures. Hamilton et al (6) found that natural and truck-induced wind gusts may be major contributors to out-of-plane mast arm vibrations, a finding supported by Cook et al (10). Albert et al (11) determined that overall natural wind gusts produce a larger response in cantilevered traffic signal structures than gusts produced by trucks passing beneath the signals, a conclusion consistent with findings by Hartnagel and Barker (12) and Chen et al (13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Truck-induced wind gusts are the result of large vehicles passing beneath the signal support structures. Hamilton et al (6) found that natural and truck-induced wind gusts may be major contributors to out-of-plane mast arm vibrations, a finding supported by Cook et al (10). Albert et al (11) determined that overall natural wind gusts produce a larger response in cantilevered traffic signal structures than gusts produced by trucks passing beneath the signals, a conclusion consistent with findings by Hartnagel and Barker (12) and Chen et al (13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…tube thin-walled circular members with little inherent damping. A measure of the inherent damping in a system, or the ability to dissipate energy, is the critical damping ratio (5), which has been measured to be between 0.15% to 0.5% (6) in traffic signal support structures. Low damping can result in a dynamic response that is many times larger than the static response caused by the same load.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Galloping is most likely the primary cause of excessive vibrations in these types of structures. Hamilton et al [9] hypothesize that due to the overall interaction of the entire mast arm structure, galloping may also initiate horizontal motion.…”
Section: Fatigue D E Sig N T Esting and M Odelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various mitigation devices have been proposed for traffic signal support structures with varying degrees of complexity and performance (4,(10)(11)(12). Hamilton et al conducted extensive studies of different types of vibration absorbers attached to a 50-ft (15.24-m) mast arm (12). Free vibration tests were conducted, and acceleration measurements at the tip of the mast arm were used to determine the critical damping ratio of the traffic signal structure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This damper was relatively complex and had a high manufacturing cost. Hamilton et al also considered a dual strut configuration that required a strut to be placed at an angle between the mast arm and the pole (12). The strut was found to increase the critical damping ratio to 6.00%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%