1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf01908056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased effective vascular compliance and venous pooling of intravascular volume during sustained venodilation in conscious dogs

Abstract: The hemodynamic effects of the long-acting antianginal drug molsidomine were studied in 8 chronically instrumented conscious dogs by measuring the partition of the intravascular volume and the effective compliance of the total vascular bed. The blood volume of the resting dogs was varied by +/- 4 ml/kg in a cycle of blood infusion, withdrawal and reinfusion within 12 minutes. Relating the observed alterations in mean right atrial pressure to the induced changes in intravascular volume, an effective compliance … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Sigma Chemical, Munich, FRG) and by semilogarithmic extrapolation of arterial plasma concentration at injection time from several plasma samples, analyzed photometrically at 578 nm, obtained 10-40 minutes after the injection. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] hours after the final diclofenac injection, these dogs were anesthetized and prepared for measurement of compliance under ganglionic and ,Badrenergic blockade as described for protocols 1-7. Compared with the effects of norepinephrine infusion in the same model, the COI in protocols 1 and 2 caused preferential venoconstriction.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Sigma Chemical, Munich, FRG) and by semilogarithmic extrapolation of arterial plasma concentration at injection time from several plasma samples, analyzed photometrically at 578 nm, obtained 10-40 minutes after the injection. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] hours after the final diclofenac injection, these dogs were anesthetized and prepared for measurement of compliance under ganglionic and ,Badrenergic blockade as described for protocols 1-7. Compared with the effects of norepinephrine infusion in the same model, the COI in protocols 1 and 2 caused preferential venoconstriction.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the VOL 8, No 11, NOVEMBER 1986 a-agonists did not significantly decrease cardiac output (see Table 3). Second, the increased central venous pressure values during administration of a-agonists were always well within the normal range found in conscious dogs 22 and were not in a range consistent with cardiac failure. Third, in experiments similar to the ones presented, which were performed in dogs equipped with chronic aortic flowmeters, cardiac output never changed inversely with the cycle of volume changes, neither under control conditions nor during an infusion of norepinephrine, 0.15 /ug/kg/min.…”
Section: Discussion Critique Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Under ganglionic blockade, effective vascular compliance was higher and central venous pressure was lower than those in untreated conscious dogs. 22 Basal data during prazosin (Protocols 3 and 4) were not different from those in control Protocols 1 and 2. With rauwolscine, a higher mean arterial (p<0.05) and slightly higher central venous pressure (not significant) were observed, while effective vascular compliance tended to be lower (not significant) than that in the control Protocols 1 and 2).…”
Section: Selective A-agonists and Effective Vascular Compliance (Protmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations