Heparin is the standard treatment of deep vein thrombosis; the aim of this treatment is to prevent further thrombus growth, although minimal thrombolysis may be expected. In an animal thrombosis model, 1 ' 2 a significant reduction of the size of the thrombus has been obtained with low molecular weight heparins (LMWH), suggesting that these products may be of value in the curative treatment of thrombosis. A recent comparative study of standard heparin and LMWH showed a similar thrombolytic effect of both drugs but with the latter having no side effect. 3 In order to explain the reduction of the size of the thrombus obtained with heparin or LMWH, several studies attempted to demonstrate a profibrinolytic effect of these drugs. Investigations mainly concerned an effect on the release of tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) by endothelial cells. The results of these studies are controversial.After a single injection of heparin or LMWH in human volunteers, an increase in euglobulin fibrinolytic activity (EFA) was observed 2 and 4 hours after the injection of LMWH, 1,4 and in one study the level of t-PA antigen was shown to be elevated after the injection. 5 However, the increase in EFA could have resulted from circadian fluctuations of the fibrinolytic activity with decrease of the PA inhibitor level in the early afternoon hours. 6 ' 7The observation of an increase in EFA in the eluate of organs perfused with heparin or LMWH 1,8 suggested an effect on the release of t-PA by the vascular bed.The same conclusion was suggested by Arnesen et al, 9 who showed that patients receiving heparin during the pre-and postoperative periods exhibited a larger increase in t-PA activity and t-PA antigen after venous occlusion the third day after surgery than patients not receiving heparin.In patients with deep vein thrombosis receiving high dose of the LMWH CY 222 (Choay, Paris, France), we looked for a relationship between the thrombolytic effect of CY 222 and the change in plasma fibrinolytic parameters: 10 a good thrombolytic effect evaluated by phlebography was obtained after 7 days of treatment but no change in EFA, t-PA antigen, and PA inhibitor occurred during treatment. These results were not consistent with the stimulating effect of CY 222 on the release of t-PA by endothelial cells, or with an effect on PA inhibitor. However, a direct effect of LMWH on the patient's own fibrinolytic system could be involved. To test this hypothesis, we looked for a direct effect of the LMWH CY 222 on t-PA activity and single chain urokinase PA (scu-PA) activity in animal studies: 11 in a model of jugular vein thrombosis in which rabbits received t-PA or scu-PA and standard heparin or LMWH, we found that CY 222 potentiated the thrombolytic effect of t-PA and to a lesser extent of scu-PA.
THROMBOLYSIS AND PLASMA FIBRINOLYTIC PARAMETERS IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH CY 222Thirty patients with recently diagnosed (less than 7 days) deep vein thrombosis who had given their informed consent were randomized into three treatment groups and received 4...