2002
DOI: 10.1159/000071041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased frequency of X-bearing sperm in males from an infertility clinic: analysis by two-color fluorescence in situ hybridization

Abstract: Semen samples from 34 men visiting the Lübeck infertility clinic were investigated using a two-color FISH method to determine the ratio of X- and Y-bearing sperm. The overall ratio was significantly shifted to a preponderance of X-containing sperm. A statistical comparison with seven reports from the literature which included 53 normal probands demonstrated in our patients a significant tendency of a preponderance of X-bearing sperm and significantly less Y-bearing sperm. Furthermore, the Lübeck sperm samples … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
5
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Image processing and scoring were performed using custom software developed in MATLAB (Mathworks Inc., Natick, MA), using classification and scoring algorithms based on the scoring criteria described by Baumgartner et al (1999). The overall hybridization efficiency was 97%, which is consistent with the hybridization efficiency reported by other groups (Johannisson et al 2002; Martin et al 1996; Tiido et al 2005). These methods have been described in detail elsewhere (Perry et al 2011).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Image processing and scoring were performed using custom software developed in MATLAB (Mathworks Inc., Natick, MA), using classification and scoring algorithms based on the scoring criteria described by Baumgartner et al (1999). The overall hybridization efficiency was 97%, which is consistent with the hybridization efficiency reported by other groups (Johannisson et al 2002; Martin et al 1996; Tiido et al 2005). These methods have been described in detail elsewhere (Perry et al 2011).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Also the overall hybridization efficiency was from 98.91 to 99.36% which is higher with the hybridization efficiency (97%) reported by other groups (Johannisson et al, 2002;Tiido et al, 2005;Martin, 2006).…”
Section: Tablecontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…However, a hybridization efficiency of 95% or more is in good accordance with the hybridization efficiency previously reported [67,68].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%