2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.12.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased guarding duration reduces growth and offspring number in females of the skeleton shrimp Caprella penantis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; Takeshita et al. ), some studies have found that larger males impose longer mate‐guarding durations, but only when females were able to resist male guarding attempts (Jormalainen & Merilaita , ). These studies suggest that larger males are often better at overcoming female resistance to pairing than small males.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…; Takeshita et al. ), some studies have found that larger males impose longer mate‐guarding durations, but only when females were able to resist male guarding attempts (Jormalainen & Merilaita , ). These studies suggest that larger males are often better at overcoming female resistance to pairing than small males.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In stone leek leafminers (Liriomyza chinensis), there was no effect of male body size on the harm imposed on females (Tran & Takagi 2006). In crustaceans, where males and females often disagree over precopulatory mate-guarding duration (e.g., Jormalainen & Shuster 1999;Sparkes et al 2000;Takeshita et al 2011), some studies have found that larger males impose longer mate-guarding durations, but only when females were able to resist male guarding attempts (Jormalainen & Merilaita 1993, 1995. These studies suggest that larger males are often better at overcoming female resistance to pairing than small males.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference in optimal mating rate affects the level of sexual conflict (Arnqvist and Rowe, 2005). Generally, male mating strategies impose non-trivial reproductive costs on females in terms of offspring production (Rossi, Nonacs, and Pitts-Singer, 2010; Takeshita, Lombardo, Wada, and Henmi, 2011), male harassment (Helinski and Harrington, 2012), insemination (Arnqvist and Nilsson, 2000), maternal care (Boncoraglio and Kilner, 2012), physical injury (Crudgington and Siva-Jothy, 2000) and/or death (Leboeuf and Mesnick, 1991; Réale, Boussès, and Chapuis, 1996). Sexual selection is expected to favor counter-adaptations to these costs in females that will maximize their individual fitness (Arnqvist and Rowe, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference in optimal mating rate affects the level of sexual conflict (Arnqvist and Rowe, 2005). Generally, male mating strategies impose non-trivial reproductive costs on females in terms of offspring production (Rossi, Nonacs, and Pitts-Singer, 2010;Takeshita, Lombardo, Wada, and Henmi, 2011), male harassment (Helinski and Harrington, 2012), insemination (Arnqvist and Nilsson, 2000), maternal care (Boncoraglio and Kilner, 2012), physical injury Evolutionary Psychology -ISSN 1474-7049 -Volume 11(2). 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%