2016
DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000001163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased Intraoperative Fluid Administration Is Associated with Severe Primary Graft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation

Abstract: Background Severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a major cause of early morbidity and mortality in patients after lung transplantation. The etiology and pathophysiology of PGD is not fully characterized and whether intraoperative fluid administration increases the risk for PGD remains unclear from previous studies. We therefore tested the hypothesis that increased total intraoperative fluid volume during lung transplantation is associated with the development of grade-3 PGD. Methods This retrospective co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…PGD is the main cause of early post-operative morbidity and mortality in patients after lung transplantation. 24 In addition, it is associated with increased risk for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, long-term deterioration in pulmonary function, and reduced overall long-term survival. [4][5][6][7][8] In a prospective multicenter cohort, Diamond et al 8 results of 41,200 lung transplantations that were performed in an 8-year period in 10 major centers in the United States.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PGD is the main cause of early post-operative morbidity and mortality in patients after lung transplantation. 24 In addition, it is associated with increased risk for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, long-term deterioration in pulmonary function, and reduced overall long-term survival. [4][5][6][7][8] In a prospective multicenter cohort, Diamond et al 8 results of 41,200 lung transplantations that were performed in an 8-year period in 10 major centers in the United States.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In double-lung transplantations, reperfusion time of the second lung was designated as the overall reperfusion time as previously reported by others. 24 Initial mechanical ventilation of the transplanted lungs consisted of pressure-controlled ventilation titrated to a target tidal volume of 6-8 ml/kg ideal body weight, inspired oxygen concentration r50% if tolerated, and positive end-expiratory pressure of 8-10 cm H 2 O. Weaning from mechanical ventilation and tracheal extubation were performed post-operatively as soon as possible based on the assessment of the attending intensivist and the transplant pulmonologist and followed standardized postoperative treatment algorithms. If profound hypoxemia with or without severe hemodynamic decompensation persisted despite adequate mechanical ventilation and hemodynamic pharmacologic support, patients were supported by ECMO after reperfusion.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Реципиенты, перенесшие трансфузию значительных объемов эритроцитарной массы, имеют высокие риски развития ПДЛТ 3-й ст. Установлено 2-кратное повышение риска развития ПДЛТ при трансфузии более 1 литра эритроцитарной массы [25,46]. Использование ЭКМО в периоперационном периоде ассоциировано с развитием геморрагических, сосудистых и септических осложнений, а также явлений почечной недостаточности, требующих заместительной почечной терапии [47].…”
Section: факторы риска развития послеоперационных осложнений обусловunclassified
“…The factors that explain the relationship between operation time and ECMO weaning remain unknown. One possible explanation is that fluid administration increases as the operation time becomes longer, and this added fluid aggravates pulmonary edema and causes hypoxemia [27]. Total fluid (including blood products) intake during the surgery in the ECMO weaning failure group was much more than that in the successful ECMO weaning group (13,429 mL versus 11,014 mL, p ¼ 0.073).…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%