Increased Length of Stay of Critically Ill Patients in the Emergency Department Associated with Higher In-hospital Mortality

Abstract

Objectives Emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS) is defined as the time a patient is registered to the time the patient is shifted to a hospital bed or discharged. Increasing demand for quality emergency care has resulted in increased wait times due to demand and supply mismatch. It is perceived that longer LOS in the ED of critical patients leads to poor outcomes. Our goal was to study the impact of LOS in the ED on the patients who required critical care admissions. Methods This was a retrospective study conducted in the ED of a tertiary center. Data were collected using electronic health records (EHR) for patients admitted to the intensive care units (ICUs). Patient's LOS in ED was divided into 0–4, 4–8, 8–12, 12–24, and >24 hours. ED LOS was calculated from the registration time to the time patient was handed over in the ICU. Patients were divided into four categories (1–4) based on their criticality. LOS in ED, mortality, and total hospital LOS were analyzed in the study. Results Three thousand four hundred and twenty-nine patients were enrolled in the study. Mean age was 62.69 years (95% CI 62.11–63.26). A total of 42.09% (95% CI 40.5–43.8) were Category 1 patients. Overall mortality rate was 52.46% (95% CI 50.79–54.13). LOS of 48.15% (95% CI 46.54–49.88) patients in the ED was between 0 and 4 hours, 19.90% (95% CI 18.62–21.29) between 4 and 8 hours, 8.21% (95% CI 7.35–9.19) between 8 and 12 hours, 15.50% (95% CI 14.34–16.77) between 12 and 24 hours, and 8.13% (95% CI 7.27–9.10) >24 hours. Mortality for LOS of 0–4 hours was 51.30% (95% CI 48.89–53.70), 54.03% (95% CI 50.28–57.73) for 4–8 hours, 48.94% (95% CI 43.16–54.75) for 8–12 hours, 51.50% (95% CI 47.26–55.72) for 12–24 hours, and 60.57% (95% CI 54.73–66.13) for >24 hours. Conclusion We concluded that the longer the critically ill patients are boarded in the ED, the higher is the chance for mortality. Processes should be implemented to ease the throughput from the ED. How to cite this article Verma A, Shishodia S, Jaiswal S, Sheikh WR, Haldar M, Vishen A, et al. Increased Length of Stay of Critically Ill Patients in the Emergency Department Associated with Higher In-hospital Mortality. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(11):1221–1225.

Rates of general practitioner attendance following paramedic-to-general practitioner referral in Victoria, Australia

“…Avoidable presentations to an ED are burdensome for both the individual patient and the wider community. [10][11][12] Whilst increasing linked data literature offers the opportunity to explore adverse events from these referrals such as subsequent ED presentation, hospital admission or death, 13,14 it is currently unclear what proportion of patients will proceed to attend their GP if advised to by a paramedic. Due to the nature of their practice, paramedics are unable to individually follow up with these patients to determine if they have attended their GP or required further management.…”

“…Avoidable presentations to an ED are burdensome for both the individual patient and the wider community. 10–12…”

The development and validation of a novel deep-learning algorithm to predict in-hospital cardiac arrest in ED-ICU (emergency department-based intensive care units): a single center retrospective cohort study

“…Over recent years, emergency departments (ED) worldwide have witnessed a surge in patient volumes, leading to increased overcrowding and mounting challenges in the delivery of timely critical care [1]. Increasing acuity has led to a greater need for critical care services in EDs and intensive care units (ICUs) [2] and several studies have demonstrated that increased boarding time and ED crowding, which may lead to shortage of ED staff and the availability of resources to attend high acuity patients, is strongly associated with worse outcomes in critically ill patients [3][4][5][6]. The discharge of patients and movement to inpatients units represents an important output component of a conceptual framework to measure crowding within EDs that features three "buckets": input, throughput and output [7].…”

What's new in critical illness and injury science? The use of risk stratification tools in patients with suspected sepsis in the acute care settings

“…again report improved the sensitivity of NEWS2 compared to qSOFA for identifying septic patients. [ 11 ] As this is known and well established, we encourage future efforts to focus more on comparing higher performing scores such as NEWS2, MEDS, and REDS to greater benefit those in the clinical setting. The availability of component variables at triage makes NEWS2 an attractive candidate for such use; however, a clearer understanding of the sensitivity and specificity of NEWS2 as compared to MEDS, REDS, and others is needed.…”