2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-015-2450-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased litter input increases litter decomposition and soil respiration but has minor effects on soil organic carbon in subtropical forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
33
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
6
33
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, we found that mixed-species litter significantly promoted soil respiration. Previous studies suggested that differences in initial litter chemical traits combined with increasing litter inputs could result in potential changes in soil respiration [1, 57]. In a previous study [38], we found that mass loss of litter mixtures was slightly more often promoted by species mixing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 44%
“…Similarly, we found that mixed-species litter significantly promoted soil respiration. Previous studies suggested that differences in initial litter chemical traits combined with increasing litter inputs could result in potential changes in soil respiration [1, 57]. In a previous study [38], we found that mass loss of litter mixtures was slightly more often promoted by species mixing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 44%
“…These studies suggest that modifying stand conditions could result in complex influences on the amount of litter. Litter amount can affect the rates of decomposition by changing physicochemical characteristics and resource variability in litter horizons (Fang, Zhao, Zhou, Huang, & Liu, 2015;Gripp et al, 2018;Parsons et al, 2014). Conversely, the discrepancies in litter properties at different decomposition stages may also result in variability of litter amount.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scientists recently pay more attention to the changes in soil C sequestration and water cycling following afforestation (Huang et al, 2011;Tang and Li, 2013;Cao and Zhang, 2015), but usually ignore the soil N dynamic after afforestation for decades, which may not be enough to capture the trends in long-term soil organic matter (SOM) dynamics (Davidson et al, 2007). It has been suggested afforestation can impact the soil organic C and N dynamics by altering SOM input and decomposition rate Deng et al, 2014;Fang et al, 2015). However, our understanding of soil organic C and N dynamics is still limited, particularly the different turnover of SOM fractions in response to afforestation (Marin-Spiotta et al, 2009;Huang et al, 2011;Cheng et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%