Abstract:PurposeVariations in bony morphology have been associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk. The primary aim of this study was to compare the tibial slope in the teenage pediatric population with open physes, with and without ACL injury. The secondary aims were to compare the notch width index (NWI) and determine the influence of gender and age on tibial slope and NWI.MethodsThirty-nine teenage pediatric subjects were included in this study, 16 with and 23 without ACL injury. Medial tibial slop… Show more
“…3 Of the 6 studies that compared LTPS in ACL-injured and uninjured groups as a whole, 1 radiographic study and 1 MRI-based study found no significant difference between injured and uninjured groups. 18,41 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,36 For ACL-injured patients, the medial slope ranged from 1.8° ± 3.5° anterior to 12.1° ± 3.3° posterior. 3,41
Figure 4 shows the absolute measurements for MTPS by study. The unweighted mean effect size for the 13 studies was .388, indicating a more posterior MTPS in ACL-injured populations than controls.…”
Background
In vivo studies reporting tibial plateau slope as a risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury have been published with greatly increasing frequency.
Purpose
To examine and summarize the in vivo evidence comparing tibial slope in ACL-injured and uninjured populations.
Study Design
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Methods
We reviewed publications in Scopus, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, and PubMed to identify all studies reporting a measure of tibial plateau slope between ACL-injured groups and controls. A meta-analysis was performed including calculation of effect size and 95% confidence interval as well as 95% confidence intervals for the mean values of the measurement in each study.
Results
Fourteen studies met our inclusion/exclusion criteria. Five of 6 radiographic studies reporting medial tibial plateau slope (MTPS) demonstrated significant differences between controls and ACL-injured groups, while only 1 of 7 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies reported significant differences between groups. Mean MTPS measurements and standard deviations reported for controls ranged from 2.9° ± 2.8° anterior to 9.5° ± 3° posterior. For ACL-injured patients, MTPS ranged from 1.8° ± 3.5° anterior to 12.1° ± 3.3° posterior. Lateral tibial plateau slope (LTPS) was reported to be significantly greater in ACL-injured groups in all 5 MRI-based studies reporting group comparisons. Mean values for LTPS in controls ranged from 0.3° ± 3.6° anterior slope to 9° ± 4° posterior slope. In ACL-injured groups, mean reported LTPS values ranged from 1.8° ± 3.2° to 11.5° ± 3.54° posterior slope.
Conclusion
Despite high measures of reliability for the various methods reported in current studies, there is vast disagreement regarding the actual values of the slope that would be considered “at risk.” Reported tibial slope values for control groups vary greatly between studies. In many cases, the study-to-study differences in “normal” tibial slope exceed the difference between controls and ACL-injured patients. The clinical utility of imaging-based measurement methods for the determination of ACL injury risk requires more reliable techniques that demonstrate consistency between studies.
“…3 Of the 6 studies that compared LTPS in ACL-injured and uninjured groups as a whole, 1 radiographic study and 1 MRI-based study found no significant difference between injured and uninjured groups. 18,41 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,36 For ACL-injured patients, the medial slope ranged from 1.8° ± 3.5° anterior to 12.1° ± 3.3° posterior. 3,41
Figure 4 shows the absolute measurements for MTPS by study. The unweighted mean effect size for the 13 studies was .388, indicating a more posterior MTPS in ACL-injured populations than controls.…”
Background
In vivo studies reporting tibial plateau slope as a risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury have been published with greatly increasing frequency.
Purpose
To examine and summarize the in vivo evidence comparing tibial slope in ACL-injured and uninjured populations.
Study Design
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Methods
We reviewed publications in Scopus, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, and PubMed to identify all studies reporting a measure of tibial plateau slope between ACL-injured groups and controls. A meta-analysis was performed including calculation of effect size and 95% confidence interval as well as 95% confidence intervals for the mean values of the measurement in each study.
Results
Fourteen studies met our inclusion/exclusion criteria. Five of 6 radiographic studies reporting medial tibial plateau slope (MTPS) demonstrated significant differences between controls and ACL-injured groups, while only 1 of 7 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies reported significant differences between groups. Mean MTPS measurements and standard deviations reported for controls ranged from 2.9° ± 2.8° anterior to 9.5° ± 3° posterior. For ACL-injured patients, MTPS ranged from 1.8° ± 3.5° anterior to 12.1° ± 3.3° posterior. Lateral tibial plateau slope (LTPS) was reported to be significantly greater in ACL-injured groups in all 5 MRI-based studies reporting group comparisons. Mean values for LTPS in controls ranged from 0.3° ± 3.6° anterior slope to 9° ± 4° posterior slope. In ACL-injured groups, mean reported LTPS values ranged from 1.8° ± 3.2° to 11.5° ± 3.54° posterior slope.
Conclusion
Despite high measures of reliability for the various methods reported in current studies, there is vast disagreement regarding the actual values of the slope that would be considered “at risk.” Reported tibial slope values for control groups vary greatly between studies. In many cases, the study-to-study differences in “normal” tibial slope exceed the difference between controls and ACL-injured patients. The clinical utility of imaging-based measurement methods for the determination of ACL injury risk requires more reliable techniques that demonstrate consistency between studies.
“…slope was associated with ACL tear [5,13,40,43,44,46]; on the contrary, others rejected this correlation [4,8,15,17,18,39,42]. Moreover, there exist two metaanalyses came to totally opposite conclusions [48,49].…”
“…Femoral notch characteristics and tibial plateau slope and/or depth have been proposed as morphologic risk factors possible to identify from standard X-ray evaluation (Vyas et al 2011;Smith et al 2012b;Wordeman et al 2012). Females are more likely than males to have a narrow A-shaped intercondylar notch which has been associated to gender-specific risk factor (Sutton and Bullock 2013).…”
Section: Radiographic Assessment Of Bone Morphology Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Females are more likely than males to have a narrow A-shaped intercondylar notch which has been associated to gender-specific risk factor (Sutton and Bullock 2013). However, notch width index has not been considered a feasible method (Vyas et al 2011). …”
Section: Radiographic Assessment Of Bone Morphology Risk Factorsmentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.