Increased Nonionic Surfactant Efficiency in Oil Recovery by Integrating with Hydrophilic Silica Nanoparticle

Abstract

Nonionic surfactants are nonvolatile and benign chemicals widely used in the oil and gas industry. However, their huge loss especially under high temperature and high salinity conditions has limited their large-scale applications; thus, various additives were introduced to prepare compounded systems. This paper mainly focuses on nonionic surfactant−silica nanoparticle augmented systems. Herein, an extensive series of adsorption tests related to the adsorption of surfactant on nanoparticles and surfactant adsorption behavior change with the presence of nanoparticles was conducted, together with their combined effects on interfacial properties and their potentials in boosting oil production, trying to systematically evaluate their synergistic interactions and reveal the underlying functional mechanisms. Experimental results showed that surfactant adsorption was generally reduced with the addition of nanoparticles, and the efficiency largely depended on the adsorbents and nanoparticle size. In addition, the properties of nanofluids differ at varying surfactant/nanoparticle concentration ratios because of diverse surfactant adsorption structures, and smaller particles turned out to be better surfactant carriers. In the spontaneous imbibition tests, positive cooperative effects by integrating nanoparticles with surfactant were highlighted, where the nanoparticles efficiently improved the surfactant performance and a considerable amount of additional oil was recovered. Acknowledging the interactions and combined effects of nonionic surfactants and hydrophilic silica nanoparticles may shed light on the development and improvement of potential nanofluids for industrial practices.

SDS–Aluminum Oxide Nanofluid for Enhanced Oil Recovery: IFT, Adsorption, and Oil Displacement Efficiency

“…The reason for using the conductivity method is that the concentration of solutions is independent of NP concentration. 21 By knowing the initial surfactant concentration and the equilibrium concentration, the adsorption density of surfactant can be calculated using eq 1 ( 22 ) where q e represents the adsorption density of surfactant (mg/g), V is the volume of the surfactant solution (L), C i is the initial concentration of the solution (mg/L), C eq is the surfactant concentration after being equilibrated with sand grains (mg/L), and m is the total mass of sandstone.…”

“… 21 showed that hydrophobic silica NPs are more effective than hydrophilic silica NPs in reducing surfactant adsorption. Zhong et al 22 investigated nonionic surfactant losses on Bakken and Berea rocks with and without SiO 2 NPs and observed a significant relationship between NP efficacy and the nature of adsorbents. Asl et al 1 reported a 12.7% increase in oil recovery due to the synergistic effect between the amino acid surfactant and SiO 2 NPs.…”

Characterization, Micellization Behavior, and Performance of a Novel Surfactant Derived from Gundelia tournefortii Plant during Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery

“…There are some commercial ionic and nonionic surfactants that alter the wettability and decrease the IFT. However, the current focus to achieve wettability alteration is through the use of natural, environmentally friendly surfactants. ,, Kiani et al (2019) used green low surface energy surfactants as a new class of green surfactants for CEOR, obtaining equivalent IFTs as achieved with high stability in harsh conditions used in CEOR flooding processes . Saha and Uppaluri and Tiwari (2019) studied on the extracted surfactant from Reetha natural plant to increase the recovery of crude oil for improved oil recovery methods.…”

Study on a Nonionic Surfactant/Nanoparticle Composite Flooding System for Enhanced Oil Recovery

“… 19 Zhong et al studied the S/NP composite system based on polyethoxylated nonionic surfactants and hydrophilic silica nanoparticles and reached the same conclusions. 20 …”