“…Emerging evidence from animal and human studies indicates that neuroplastic changes in the properties of the face‐SMCx can be induced by alterations in somatosensory inputs to the face‐SMCx from the orofacial region (e.g., as a result of nerve injury, noxious stimulation, orthodontic tooth movement, incisor tooth trimming, or extraction) and by altered motor function associated with learning of novel oral motor skills. These neuroplastic changes can be manifested, for example, as a change in motor (and/or sensory) representations and/or in the ICMS threshold intensities for evoking motor responses (i.e., increased or decreased excitability) (e.g., Adachi et al, , 2008; Boudreau et al, , ; Avivi‐Arber et al, ,b, 2011b; Kato et al, ; Arce et al, ; Sessle et al, ; Awamleh et al, ; Sood et al, ). Consistent with a large number of studies focusing on limb‐M1 and vibrissal‐M1 (for review, see Ebner, ; Teskey and Kolb, ; Kleim, ; Young et al, ), these studies suggest that face‐SMCx neuroplasticity may be crucial for the ability of animals and humans to adapt to intraoral changes and learn new or relearn lost orofacial motor skills.…”