2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2022.104199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased positive affect is associated with less generalization of pain-related avoidance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sixth, despite evidence suggesting that asking people multiple times per day about their pain does not impact pain experience beyond single time point assessments, 71 it is important to acknowledge the large body of research linking pain to attentional processes, 72 and, therefore, it is important for work to continue evaluating the role of intensive assessment on reporting of pain experience. Further, we did not collect information on positive affect, and given the adolescent literature highlighting that greater positive affect is associated with less pain-related avoidance and increased activity engagement, 73 it would be important to replicate the findings, accounting for positive affect. Relatedly, while there is significant heterogeneity in the choice of assessment tools in EMA studies, a large proportion of the studies have used the positive and negative affect schedule to assess positive and NA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sixth, despite evidence suggesting that asking people multiple times per day about their pain does not impact pain experience beyond single time point assessments, 71 it is important to acknowledge the large body of research linking pain to attentional processes, 72 and, therefore, it is important for work to continue evaluating the role of intensive assessment on reporting of pain experience. Further, we did not collect information on positive affect, and given the adolescent literature highlighting that greater positive affect is associated with less pain-related avoidance and increased activity engagement, 73 it would be important to replicate the findings, accounting for positive affect. Relatedly, while there is significant heterogeneity in the choice of assessment tools in EMA studies, a large proportion of the studies have used the positive and negative affect schedule to assess positive and NA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Converging with this view, within our sample, positivity was correlated with behavioral perseverance ( r = .54), the resilience dimension that reflects low pain avoidance. Higher levels of positive affect have also been linked to less generalized avoidance of painful physical movements following nociception in laboratory research (Vandael et al, 2022 ) and higher levels of engagement in healthy daily activities rather than pain avoidance among people with chronic pain (Finan & Garland, 2015 ). Finally, studies of optimism—a construct that overlaps with the cognitive aspect of positivity (Slepian et al, 2016 )—have found stronger positive expectations about future outcomes predict behaviors that reflect low pain avoidance (i.e., higher levels of goal perseverance, effort, and goal attainment) (Affleck et al, 2001 ; Duke et al, 2002 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, college students' PR might increase PB by reducing NA and increasing PA. NA strengthens counterproductive work behavior ( 87 ), like violating PB in the COVID-19 pandemic, and meanwhile negatively affects health behavior ( 88 ). Individuals with higher levels of PA are more likely to care for themselves ( 89 ) and show great potential in health behavior learning ( 90 ). PA can help people cope with PR, especially after the COVID-19 lockdown ( 91 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%