2000
DOI: 10.1107/s0907444900005941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased resolution data from a large unit cell crystal collected at a third-generation synchrotron X-ray source

Abstract: A third‐generation synchrotron source was used to collect data from crystals with a very large unit cell. There was an increase in the effective resolution of the data from 5 to 3.5 Å. Data were collected on crystals of HK97 mature empty capsids, space group P21, with unit‐cell parameters a = 580, b = 625, c = 790 Å, β = 90.0°. Like other crystals with very large unit‐cell dimensions, the intensity falls off rapidly as a function of resolution, with a precipitous drop beginning at 9 Å resolution. Synchrotron d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Determination of the particle orientation and position at 7 A resolution was described (16). The data were subsequently extended to 3.45 A resolution (17), and a total of 22 million reflections (4.8 million unique) were measured on unfrozen crystals. The phasing to 3.6 A resolution is described in Table 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determination of the particle orientation and position at 7 A resolution was described (16). The data were subsequently extended to 3.45 A resolution (17), and a total of 22 million reflections (4.8 million unique) were measured on unfrozen crystals. The phasing to 3.6 A resolution is described in Table 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These experiments often require the collection of significantly more than 180 of data in order to obtain a sufficient data redundancy, and they are carried out at long wavelengths where careful flux adjustment is required to compensate for the increase of the photoelectric cross section, which would otherwise entail a higher dose to the crystal thereby causing more rapid sample deterioration for the same incident flux. Another way to reduce radiation damage and improve data quality in mediumresolution data collections, which will not be discussed here, is to focus the beam on the detector, whereby the flux density will be reduced on the sample but maximized on the detector (Wikoff et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size of the beam at the sample position was 600 mm horizontally and 350 mm vertically. This set-up exposes the entire crystal volume and reduces radiation damage, as described by Wikoff et al (2000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%