2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased Resting-State Functional Connectivity in the Cingulo-Opercular Cognitive-Control Network after Intervention in Children with Reading Difficulties

Abstract: Dyslexia, or reading difficulty, is characterized by slow, inaccurate reading accompanied by executive dysfunction. Reading training using the Reading Acceleration Program improves reading and executive functions in both children with dyslexia and typical readers. This improvement is associated with increased activation in and functional connectivity between the anterior cingulate cortex, part of the cingulo-opercular cognitive-control network, and the fusiform gyrus during a reading task after training. The o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
56
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
10
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of the neurobiological model for EF suggested previously (Dosenbach, Fair, Cohen, Schlaggar, & Petersen, ), there are separate neural networks supporting speed of processing and working memory (i.e., fronto‐parietal network) and error monitoring and inhibition (i.e., cingulo‐opercular network). Additional networks were related to attention (dorsal attention, default mode network, and salience; Corbetta & Shulman, ) and the changes in correlations found in the current study may be a result of changes in functional connectivity within or between these networks between the two groups and across tasks, as was found previously (Horowitz‐Kraus, Toro‐Serey, et al, ). This point should be studied further.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the basis of the neurobiological model for EF suggested previously (Dosenbach, Fair, Cohen, Schlaggar, & Petersen, ), there are separate neural networks supporting speed of processing and working memory (i.e., fronto‐parietal network) and error monitoring and inhibition (i.e., cingulo‐opercular network). Additional networks were related to attention (dorsal attention, default mode network, and salience; Corbetta & Shulman, ) and the changes in correlations found in the current study may be a result of changes in functional connectivity within or between these networks between the two groups and across tasks, as was found previously (Horowitz‐Kraus, Toro‐Serey, et al, ). This point should be studied further.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…These results extend the findings of previous studies, suggesting that reading fluency impairments in RD (Breznitz, ) are apparent in the arithmetic domain as well. These fluency challenges in individuals with RD can be linked to the suggested deficit in EF in these readers (Horowitz‐Kraus, Toro‐Serey, & DiFrancesco, ), including the ability to monitor their errors not only in reading (Horowitz‐Kraus & Breznitz, ) but also in non‐linguistic assignments (Horowitz‐Kraus, ). This may cause utilization of solution strategies in a less efficient manner (i.e., slow processing and poor fact retrieval; Fiona & Simmons, ) or prone to less error corrections (i.e., less accurate; Horowitz‐Kraus, , b), in both fields.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, reading is not as intuitive as we may think. The neuroimaging era provides insights into the neural circuits involved in reading, and it appears that this cognitive ability relies not only on neural circuits related to language processing [2,3] but also those related to visual processing [3] and higher-level cognitive abilities, such as executive functions [4,5]. A fascinating orchestra of synchronized activation between the superior temporal gyrus and inferior frontal gyrus (i.e., language processing, see [2] the fusiform gyrus, cuneus and precuneus (i.e., visual processing, see ref.…”
Section: Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3]), and the anterior cingulate cortex in particular and the cinguloopercular and fronto-parietal cognitive control networks in general [4][5][6] all are needed for fluent reading. Given this involvement of multiple neural circuits and cognitive abilities, it is not surprising that reading difficulties may result from a variety of impairments or an altered activation in any of the aforementioned neural circuits.…”
Section: Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Um estudo apresentou os resultados obtidos ao longo de 12 anos de avaliação e intervenção de um Centro Multidisciplinar de Dificuldade de Aprendizagem na Universidade de Washington (BERNINGER et al, 2008) A maioria dos estudos envolveu crianças com idade média entre 9 e 11 anos. Um estudo investigou crianças com idade pré-escolar (THOMPSON et al, 2015), cinco investigações envolveram adolescentes (BROSNAN et al, 2002;KAPOULA et al, 2010;HOROWITZ-KRAUS;BREZNITZ, 2014;HOROWITZ-KRAUS, 2014; HOROWITZ-KRAUS; TORO-SEREY; DIFRANCESCO, 2015), e um trabalho foi realizado também com adultos (BROSNAN et al, 2002). Com relação a metodologia, 94% dos trabalhos utilizou grupo controle de leitores típicos para comparar o desempenho dos estudantes com dislexia, sendo a maioria deles pareados por idade.…”
Section: Dislexia Do Desenvolvimentounclassified