2020
DOI: 10.1080/02688697.2020.1787338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased risk of Ventriculostomy-Associated hemorrhage in patients treated with antiplatelet agents for stent-assisted coiling of ruptured intracranial aneurysms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this series, VS-ICH occurred in 13.1% of all cases, which is in line with other studies reporting rates from 10 to 20% [3,10]. While the observed predominance of ICH in the endovascular group con rms previously reported data from Scheller et al, this difference was no longer present among patients receiving no antiplatelet therapy [21]. Accordingly, the major nding of this study is that the administration of any antiplatelet therapy was the most prominent risk factor for VS-ICH.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this series, VS-ICH occurred in 13.1% of all cases, which is in line with other studies reporting rates from 10 to 20% [3,10]. While the observed predominance of ICH in the endovascular group con rms previously reported data from Scheller et al, this difference was no longer present among patients receiving no antiplatelet therapy [21]. Accordingly, the major nding of this study is that the administration of any antiplatelet therapy was the most prominent risk factor for VS-ICH.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In this regard, the primary objective of our study was to assess the risk of VS-ICH between endovascular and surgical treatment, as this is frequently debated in our clinical practice. While previous reports found no effect of VS-ICH on clinical outcome [3,8,16,21], we chose not to analyze clinical outcome in our study because we do not believe that, in the context of a retrospective study, a meaningful correlation can be drawn between these largely minor hemorrhages and the overall clinical outcome in patients often severely affected by the subarachnoid hemorrhage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, the primary objective of our study was to assess the risk of VS-ICH between endovascular and surgical treatment, as this is frequently debated in our clinical practice. While previous reports found no effect of VS-ICH on clinical outcome [ 3 , 8 , 15 , 20 ], we chose not to analyze clinical outcome in our study because we do not believe that, in the context of a retrospective study, a meaningful correlation can be drawn between these largely minor hemorrhages and the overall clinical outcome in patients often severely affected by the subarachnoid hemorrhage. Regarding acute hemorrhage-related changes in clinical status, clinical evaluation was limited since most patients were sedated at the time of VS-ICH; however, no new oculomotor dysfunction was observed in any of the patients with VS-ICH in our study cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 However, it is well established that antiplatelet agents will increase the risk of ventriculostomy associated bleeding. 9,14,15 A combination of aspirin and clopidogrel has been shown to have a more significant impact in prior studies but single-agent therapy with aspirin has been deemed low risk for symptomatic bleeding. 9 The aim of this observational study was to determine specifically whether, in the context of acute subarachnoid hemorrhage, administration of intravenous aspirin during endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms within 48 hours of the ventriculostomy procedure significantly increases the risk of ventriculostomy-associated hemorrhage and whether this bleeding alters clinical outcome (only a tiny minority of patients in this study received an additional agent, whereas many other studies included patients with dual anti-platelets in this context).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors have found VAH rates to be significantly higher when ventriculostomy is performed following aspirin administration 9 while others have shown a non-significant trend towards increased VAH if ventriculostomy is performed following aspirin administration. 15,16 For those patients drained after administration of antiplatelet agents, platelet infusions are commonly used though this may not alter the rate of associated hemorrhage. 17 The potential benefits of aspirin at slightly more delayed time points following ventriculostomy and aneurysm securing procedures, particularly during the period most associated with delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), 4 likely warrant further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%