2018
DOI: 10.1007/s13127-018-0368-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased taxon sampling provides new insights into the phylogeny and evolution of the subclass Calcaronea (Porifera, Calcarea)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the information that is provided is insufficient to fully resolve the phylogeny of minor classes. As more T9SS-acquiring species from minor classes are sequenced later on, the phylogeny of T9SS protein components will be more resolved (Alvizu et al, 2018). Different from the other 19 BI trees of T9SS protein components, the BI tree of PorR does not exhibit monophyletic clades for all major classes under Bacteroidetes (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Hence, the information that is provided is insufficient to fully resolve the phylogeny of minor classes. As more T9SS-acquiring species from minor classes are sequenced later on, the phylogeny of T9SS protein components will be more resolved (Alvizu et al, 2018). Different from the other 19 BI trees of T9SS protein components, the BI tree of PorR does not exhibit monophyletic clades for all major classes under Bacteroidetes (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In total, the dataset includes 144 different morphospecies, and a total of 807 specimens. Several studies were based on this dataset: Alvizu et al (in press); Bertolino et al 2009; Calcinai et al 2000; Cattaneo-Vietti et al 2000; Fondi et al 2014; Mangano et al 2009; Orlandini et al 2014; Papaleo et al 2012, 2013; Romoli et al 2011; Sarà 2002; Sarà et al 1992. The validity and synonyms of each species name were checked in WORMS (World Register of Marine Species; http://www.marinespecies.org; last check made on 2018-03-28).…”
Section: Taxonomic Coveragementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sponges are admittedly a challenging group to work with in taxonomy. Thanks to an increasing amount of molecular data, the traditional classifications have seen some drastic changes these last years, in the four classes of sponges: Demospongiae [ 88 , 89 ], Hexactinellida [ 90 ], Calcarea [ 91 , 92 ] and Homoscleromorpha [ 93 ]. These changes, added to the subtleties and caveats of spicule terminology, the dense taxonomy literature (not free of identification errors) make sponge taxonomy a challenging field for a non-specialist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%