2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.02.24.432576
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased transmission of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7 (VOC 2020212/01) is not accounted for by a replicative advantage in primary airway cells or antibody escape

Abstract: Lineage B.1.1.7 (Variant of Concern 202012/01) is a new SARS-CoV-2 variant which was first sequenced in the UK in September 2020 before becoming the majority strain in the UK and spreading worldwide. The rapid spread of the B.1.1.7 variant results from increased transmissibility but the virological characteristics which underpin this advantage over other circulating strains remain unknown. Here, we demonstrate that there is no difference in viral replication between B.1.1.7 and other contemporaneous SARS-CoV-2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
67
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
21
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…V1 infections have been associated with increased viral loads at the nasopharynx 32 which suggests that increased transmissibility may simply be a consequence of increased numbers of viral particles per exhaled infectious droplet. There is, however, conflicting data on this point with some indications that V1 infections might not in fact be associated with higher viral loads 59,60 . Currently there is no available data on how well the V1, V2 and V3 lineage viruses survive in the environment relative to those of other SARS-CoV-2 lineages.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…V1 infections have been associated with increased viral loads at the nasopharynx 32 which suggests that increased transmissibility may simply be a consequence of increased numbers of viral particles per exhaled infectious droplet. There is, however, conflicting data on this point with some indications that V1 infections might not in fact be associated with higher viral loads 59,60 . Currently there is no available data on how well the V1, V2 and V3 lineage viruses survive in the environment relative to those of other SARS-CoV-2 lineages.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may imply different gene expression distributions or different durability of the RNA segments in the wastewater ( Emanuel et al, 2021 ; Kim et al, 2020 ). As it is known that the Alpha variant has a more potent expression than the original NC_045512.2 ( Brown et al, 2021 ; Parker et al, 2021 ), the fact that positive SΔ69 detection is closer to the N gene detection than the proximity of positive S1 detection compared to N gene detection is understandable. However, these observations need further study and validation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SARS-CoV-2 isolate VIC was provided by NISBC, and IC19, B.1.1.7, B.1.1.7 (B) and B.1.1.7 (C) are reported in 11 , full isolate names and GISAID references are listed below. Viruses were propagated by infecting Caco-2 cells at MOI 0.01 TCID50/cell, in culture medium at 37°C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calu-3 cells were grown to 60-80% confluence prior to infection as described previously 23 . 11 , full isolate names and GISAID references are listed below. Viruses were propagated by infecting Caco-2 cells at MOI 0.01 TCID50/cell, in culture medium at 37°C.…”
Section: Cell Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation