2022
DOI: 10.1029/2021gl096868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased Variability of Biomass Burning Emissions in CMIP6 Amplifies Hydrologic Cycle in the CESM2 Large Ensemble

Abstract: Historical simulations performed for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 used biomass burning emissions between 1997 and 2014 containing higher spatial and temporal variability compared to emission inventories specified for earlier years, and compared to emissions used in previous (e.g., CMIP5) simulation intercomparisons. Using the Community Earth System Model version 2 Large Ensemble, we show this increased biomass burning emissions variability leads to amplification of the hydrologic cycle pol… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the energy budget of a regional climate system is affected significantly by horizontal and vertical energy transports of the atmosphere, and the local surface temperature is not directly linked to TOA radiation anomalies, so that the surface radiation is often advantageous to analyzing how the regional surface temperature changes in response to atmospheric radiative perturbations (Andrews et al., 2009; Boeke & Taylor, 2018; Colman, 2015; Lu & Cai, 2009; Sejas et al., 2021). Moreover, changes in surface energy fluxes are directly related to changes in the hydrological cycle (Allen & Ingram, 2002; Previdi, 2010; Zhang et al., 2023) and biogeophysical cycle (Chen et al., 2022; Heyblom et al., 2022; Laguë et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2022; Luyssaert et al., 2014), and can be used to explain the different rates of temperature increase over land versus ocean (Joshi et al., 2008; Toda et al., 2023). Hence, the surface radiation has important environmental impacts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the energy budget of a regional climate system is affected significantly by horizontal and vertical energy transports of the atmosphere, and the local surface temperature is not directly linked to TOA radiation anomalies, so that the surface radiation is often advantageous to analyzing how the regional surface temperature changes in response to atmospheric radiative perturbations (Andrews et al., 2009; Boeke & Taylor, 2018; Colman, 2015; Lu & Cai, 2009; Sejas et al., 2021). Moreover, changes in surface energy fluxes are directly related to changes in the hydrological cycle (Allen & Ingram, 2002; Previdi, 2010; Zhang et al., 2023) and biogeophysical cycle (Chen et al., 2022; Heyblom et al., 2022; Laguë et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2022; Luyssaert et al., 2014), and can be used to explain the different rates of temperature increase over land versus ocean (Joshi et al., 2008; Toda et al., 2023). Hence, the surface radiation has important environmental impacts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent analyses in the Community Earth System Model version 2 (CESM2; Danabasoglu et al., 2020) have estimated the climate effect of this change in BB emissions variability by comparing simulation scenarios with temporally‐smoothed BB emissions to scenarios with time‐varying CMIP6 emissions over the 1997 to 2014 period (DeRepentigny et al., 2022; Fasullo et al., 2022; Heyblom et al., 2022; Rodgers et al., 2021). The largest set of these comparison simulations is the CESM2 Large Ensemble (CESM2‐LE; Figure 1a; Rodgers et al., 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The largest set of these comparison simulations is the CESM2 Large Ensemble (CESM2‐LE; Figure 1a; Rodgers et al., 2021). Studies using the CESM2‐LE show that the sudden change in BB emissions variability in the CMIP6 late‐historical simulations leads to shifts in the climate, producing increases in simulated downwelling shortwave radiation and enhancing surface warming (Fasullo et al., 2022; also Figure 1b), increases in atmospheric water vapor and precipitation (Heyblom et al., 2022), and accelerated Arctic sea ice loss (DeRepentigny et al., 2022). These studies postulated that nonlinearities in the climate system's response to BB aerosols produced these climate effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is largely due to canonical experimental designs, such as the Detection and Attribution Model Intercomparison Project (DAMIP) 33 , where models are driven by total (AER and BMB) anthropogenic aerosol and precursor emissions. Although prior studies do not explicitly isolate the AMOC impacts due to AER versus BMB aerosols, some recent studies [34][35][36][37][38] have found that the relatively large interannual variability associated with BMB emissions (and their aerosols) can affect longer time scale (e.g., decadal) climate variability and its mean state. For example, an increase in BMB emissions variability from 1997-2014 (due to the inclusion of satellite data) led to cloud thinning, an increase in surface solar radiation and subsequent warming of the Northern Hemisphere (NH) 34 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%