2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10194-011-0379-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased variability of motor cortical excitability to transcranial magnetic stimulation in migraine: a new clue to an old enigma

Abstract: Increased, decreased or normal excitability to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been reported in the motor (M1) and visual cortices of patients with migraine. Light deprivation (LD) has been reported to modulate M1 excitability in control subjects (CS). Still, effects of LD on M1 excitability compared to exposure to environmental light exposure (EL) had not been previously described in patients with migraine (MP). To further our knowledge about differences between CS and MP, regarding M1 excitabilit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
10
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we acknowledge as a possible limitation of the present study that some researchers observed that the RMT was not stable over days, which may have complicated the interpretation of values measured at one point in time [38]. However, this is not completely detrimental because it may further support our findings that cortex excitability is not stable between attacks but rather undergoes daily fluctuations during the so-called migraine cycle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Finally, we acknowledge as a possible limitation of the present study that some researchers observed that the RMT was not stable over days, which may have complicated the interpretation of values measured at one point in time [38]. However, this is not completely detrimental because it may further support our findings that cortex excitability is not stable between attacks but rather undergoes daily fluctuations during the so-called migraine cycle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…36,38 This finding may be very important in developing spatially targeted therapeutic interventions for migraine in the future. 7,26 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings support the notion that migraine is a neurologic disorder caused by cortical dysfunction. 7,26 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, clinical treatment, such as TMS, may selectively target the affected region or functional neural network, which may lead to better clinical outcomes 16 . In other words, this finding may be very important in developing spatially targeted therapeutic interventions for migraine in the future 8, 30 . Third, the measurements of auditory and motor functions in the pediatric populations imply that the evaluation of a single functional modality (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This finding is important because it may explain some conflicting results in previous reports 10 . Specifically, many previous reports based on TMS 6, 8 and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) 1, 33 have revealed alteration of cortical excitability in migraine. However, it remains unclear if migraine is associated with hyper- or hypo-excitability in the cortex 10 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%