Exercise decreases primary and secondary cardiovascular events, 1,2 effects that cannot be entirely accounted for by modification of traditional risk factors. 3,4 Animal studies implicate shear stress as a key stimulus to the release of paracrine hormones, including NO, from the endothelium during exercise bouts. [5][6][7] Episodic exposure to elevations in shear stress may explain the cardioprotective effects of exercise training through direct effect on the vascular wall. 8,9 Previous studies in humans have assessed the relationship between shear rate (SR) and conduit artery diameter by increasing SR using heating 10 or exercise 10,11 or responses to different periods of arterial occlusion. 12,13 These studies are complimented by recent data from Padilla et al, 10 who demonstrated that matched SR changes associated with leg exercise and forearm heating increase brachial artery dilation to a similar extent. Although this evidence suggests that shear stress may play a role in conduit artery dilation in humans, an approach that attenuates shear as a stimulus, without affecting other potential vasodilator stimuli, is necessary to establish that SR is a key stimulus that induces conduit artery diameter change in humans.In the present study we adopted 3 general strategies to comprehensively examine the hypothesis that shear stress manipulation would alter conduit artery dilation. Leg exercise was performed at distinct intensities in the same subjects to assess dose-response relationships, with shear and diameter measured during the exercise bouts (study 1). We assessed the impact of increased shear and shear attenuation by using partial cuff inflation on 1 forearm during simultaneous bilateral measures in the radial arteries. In a second study, we assessed the impact of cycle ergometer exercise (at 80% maximum heart rate [HRmax]) on brachial artery shear and dilation using similar techniques (study 2). Finally, to address the impact of shear manipulation in the absence of exercise, we heated both forearms simultaneously by placement in water baths (42°C) and measured consequent changes in brachial shear and diameter, with a cuff inflated to manipulate shear through 1 arm (study 3). We also repeated the latter studies Abstract-The impact of manipulating shear stress on conduit artery vasodilation has not been comprehensively described in vivo. We hypothesized that manipulation of SR through the brachial and radial arteries would be associated with corresponding changes in diameter. We performed a series of studies involving the following: (1) leg cycle exercise at increasing intensities (≈70 and 85% maximum heart rate [HRmax]) with simultaneous bilateral measurement of SR in the radial arteries; (2) leg cycle exercise for 30 minutes at 80% HRmax with simultaneous bilateral measurement of velocity and diameter in the brachial arteries; and (3)