1994
DOI: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12395694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increases in Human Epidermal DR+CD1+, DR+CD1-CD36+, and DR-CD3+ Cells in Allergic Versus Irritant Patch Test Responses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar epidermal depletion of LCs has also been found in previous immunohistochemical evaluations with MHC class II or CD1 labelling [13,17] and in cytochemical assessments with ATPase staining [6]. However, other studies have shown a slight increase in DR + /CD1 + LCs in allergen patch-tested subjects [2,15]. This discrepancy can as yet not be explained, but the different results may be a consequence of the sampling and enumeration methods applied, of the time points examined, and especially of the severity of the induced allergic skin reaction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…A similar epidermal depletion of LCs has also been found in previous immunohistochemical evaluations with MHC class II or CD1 labelling [13,17] and in cytochemical assessments with ATPase staining [6]. However, other studies have shown a slight increase in DR + /CD1 + LCs in allergen patch-tested subjects [2,15]. This discrepancy can as yet not be explained, but the different results may be a consequence of the sampling and enumeration methods applied, of the time points examined, and especially of the severity of the induced allergic skin reaction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Some investigators have employed various bioengineering methods for attempting to quantify IRs (17). Differences in cytokine profiles between IR and true allergic responses have been demonstrated (18), but many features that were thought previously unique to the allergic response have also be seen in the IR, meaning that an actual distinction between the two could be argued as conceptual rather than actual (19). In practice, clinicians will continue to rely on a combination of morphology, time-course, and knowledge of allergens to differentiate between an IR and a true allergic reaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8][9] It has been reported that NA and SLS can cause increased epidermal cell proliferation. 4,6 Experimental NA irritation has been shown to decrease numbers of epidermal LCs [10][11][12][13][14] and to decrease dendrite length. 10,11 SLS also variably affects LCs in experimental irritant reactions with decreased cell numbers, 15 increased epidermal cell numbers, 16 decreased dendrite length 10 or minor differences 17 all being reported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%