2022
DOI: 10.1177/10901981221074908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increases in Muscle-Strengthening Activities Among Latinas in Seamos Saludables

Abstract: Background: Only 17% of Latinas meet national physical activity (PA) guidelines for both moderate-to-vigorous aerobic and muscle-strengthening PA. Additional health benefits are derived from the combination of aerobic and muscle-strengthening PA (vs. aerobic alone), yet there is paucity in research on muscle-strengthening activity in Latinas. The aim of this study was to examine changes in muscle-strengthening activity from baseline to 6 and 12 months in Seamos Saludables, a 12-month PA randomized controlled t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a core BCT in AI-based fitness apps, goal setting takes center stage in the analyses. The importance of goal-setting components, such as individualized training targets and progress monitoring, has frequently been highlighted in various studies (Benitez et al, 2022; Bleck et al, 2023). The user reviews of the Freeletics app constantly reinforce the value of goal setting, which is compatible with recognized psychological theories (Deci & Ryan, 2000; Locke & Latham, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a core BCT in AI-based fitness apps, goal setting takes center stage in the analyses. The importance of goal-setting components, such as individualized training targets and progress monitoring, has frequently been highlighted in various studies (Benitez et al, 2022; Bleck et al, 2023). The user reviews of the Freeletics app constantly reinforce the value of goal setting, which is compatible with recognized psychological theories (Deci & Ryan, 2000; Locke & Latham, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%