1995
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.109.3.502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increases in vocalization and motor reflex thresholds are influenced by the site of morphine microinjection: Comparisons following administration into the periaqueductal gray, ventral medulla, and spinal subarachnoid space.

Abstract: The relative influence of morphine microinjected into the periaqueductal gray, ventral medulla (nucleus raphé magnus or nucleus reticularis gigantocellularis), or spinal subarachnoid space on the thresholds of responses organized at spinal (spinal motor reflexes, SMRs), medullary (vocalizations elicited during shock, VDSs), and rhinencephalic-diencephalic (vocalization after discharges, VADs) levels of the neuraxis was assessed. Dose-dependent increases in response thresholds differed with the site of morphine… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
51
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
12
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2629,35,44 The failure to observe an increase in SMR threshold does not reflect the resistance of this response to antinociceptive treatments. In previous studies, administration of morphine into the rostral ventromedial medulla or ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (vlPAG) produced significant increases in SMR, VDS, and VAD thresholds 8,9,11,14 and the intrathecal administration of morphine, serotonin, or norepinephrine was equally effective in raising SMR, VDS, and VAD thresholds. 15 The capacity of these central treatments to elevate SMR threshold also demonstrates that SMRs are not generated by direct stimulation of the tail musculature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…2629,35,44 The failure to observe an increase in SMR threshold does not reflect the resistance of this response to antinociceptive treatments. In previous studies, administration of morphine into the rostral ventromedial medulla or ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (vlPAG) produced significant increases in SMR, VDS, and VAD thresholds 8,9,11,14 and the intrathecal administration of morphine, serotonin, or norepinephrine was equally effective in raising SMR, VDS, and VAD thresholds. 15 The capacity of these central treatments to elevate SMR threshold also demonstrates that SMRs are not generated by direct stimulation of the tail musculature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The utility of this form of tailshock as a noxious stimulus has been extensively discussed(4, 14). The intensity, duration, and timing of tailshocks were controlled by the computer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vocalizations during stimulation are organized in the brainstem (medullary level) whereas vocalization afterdischarges that outlast the actual stimulus are organized in the forebrain, including the amygdala (Borszcz 1995;Borszcz and Leaton 2003;Han and Neugebauer 2005;Nandigama and Borszcz 2003). Ultrasonic vocalizations in the 22-25 kHz range are emitted specifically in response to aversive stimuli and reflect the negative affective state of the animal (Borta et al, 2006;Han et al, 2005a;Han and Neugebauer 2005;Knutson et al, 2002;Ko et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%