Increasing access to psychological treatments for adults by improving uptake and equity: rationale and lessons from the UK

Abstract

ObjectivesAccess to psychological treatments has been defined by Gulliford as comprising supply, effectiveness, equity and uptake. In the UK, a recent national programme “Improving Access to Psychological Treatments” has significantly increased supply and assessed effectiveness, but paid less attention to uptake and equity. The model developed by Gask et al. delineating processes relevant to improving access for ‘hard-to-engage’ groups in the UK, including black and minority groups seems relevant. This paper presents studies of a large-scale ‘community workshop’ intervention model developed by Brown to improve access for adults in the UK, designed to improve uptake and equity. We describe two ‘community workshop’ interventions for common mental health problems to which people have been able to self-refer and where uptake and equity have been high. Key components of this model are a ‘group-sensitive engagement’ ethos which includes self-referral, non-diagnostic titles of the intervention, a non-mental health setting, face-to-face presentation as well as a brief intervention and an acceptable format.ConclusionThe model of community workshops with its ‘group-sensitive engagement’ ethos to which adults can self-refer may be very relevant in providing access for people with mental health needs in national and international settings.Trial registration Classic ISRCTN26634837

Impact of Online Group Psychoeducation and Support Sessions on Receptivity Towards Digital Mental Health Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Pilot Study

“…The finding that 52.5% of these benefits-eligible employees went on to use other elements of care after their first group session suggests that the sessions may have helped to increase interest in or receptivity to additional care among employees who had full access to mental health services but had not previously used them. Our results are consistent with the extant literature that single online group sessions can serve as an important starting point or conduit to additional care (Brown, 2018 ; Taylor-Rodgers & Batterham, 2014 ).…”

“…This approach has been shown to be effective for increasing comfort in engaging with mental health services and reducing personal stigma regarding mental health challenges (Alvidrez et al, 2009 ; Taylor-Rodgers & Batterham, 2014 ). Group-based sessions where community members opt in to participate have been shown to be effective for engaging people in mental health care (Brown, 2018 ). Furthermore, single-session group psychoeducation sessions have been found to improve knowledge of mental health, reduce stigma around receiving treatment, and increase willingness to recommend seeking of mental health services (Lee-Tauler et al, 2018 ).…”

How Can We Actually Change Help-Seeking Behaviour for Mental Health Problems among the General Public? Development of the ‘PLACES’ Model

“…The language used for publicising interventions could have a positive effect on help-seeking. We have described this approach as “sensitively engaging” in a previous paper [ 41 ].…”