2021
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing aridity will not offset CO2 fertilization in fast‐growing eucalypts with access to deep soil water

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 153 publications
(254 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, although we found that eCO 2 improved plant water status, of which the exact mechanisms remain uncertain. One potential candidate is that eCO 2 may affect the rooting depth and vertical distribution of roots, which determine the water acquisition capacity of roots (Nadal‐Sala et al, 2021; Wullschleger et al, 2002). Second, eCO 2 often increases non‐structural carbohydrates, which may allow plants to increase osmotic adjustment and maintain a higher water potential (Miranda‐Apodaca et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, although we found that eCO 2 improved plant water status, of which the exact mechanisms remain uncertain. One potential candidate is that eCO 2 may affect the rooting depth and vertical distribution of roots, which determine the water acquisition capacity of roots (Nadal‐Sala et al, 2021; Wullschleger et al, 2002). Second, eCO 2 often increases non‐structural carbohydrates, which may allow plants to increase osmotic adjustment and maintain a higher water potential (Miranda‐Apodaca et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, although we found that eCO 2 improved plant water status, of which the exact mechanisms remain uncertain. One potential candidate is that eCO 2 may affect the rooting depth and vertical distribution of roots, which determine the water acquisition capacity of roots (Nadal-Sala et al, 2021;Wullschleger et al, 2002).…”
Section: Con Clus Ionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emergence of an approximate, but apparently robust scaling of carbon stock with aridity at the global scale may have significant practical implications. Given the strong controls of aridity on soil nutrient availability, plant growth, and carbon fluxes, identified by CO 2 fertilization experiments, long‐term observations, and large‐scale modeling (Brookshire & Weaver, 2015; Green et al., 2019; Nadal‐Sala et al., 2021; Oren et al., 2001), as well as its robustness across climates, it is logical to surmise that the global carbon‐aridity relationships discovered here will also hold in future climates. If this was the case, expressing the carbon stock distribution conditional on the hydroclimatic regime as a function of the dryness index would allow us to estimate trends of future global carbon stocks only based on the dryness index projections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, although there have been previous synthesis studies on assessing the impacts of VPD and SM on ecosystem productivity, we lack a global database and associated mechanisms of how VPD and SM limitations vary across climatic gradients and plant functional types (PFTs). In addition, deep SM and groundwater are very important water resources for woody vegetation in semi‐arid and arid regions and forests, particularly when surface SM is depleted and becomes unavailable to plants (Baldocchi & Xu, 2007; Nadal‐Sala et al., 2021; Xu, Ji, et al., 2017; Xu, Yu, et al., 2017). Despite this, little is known about the impacts of SM observations made at different soil layers on attributing the ecosystem productivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%