1991
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1991.24-747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing Autistic Children's Daily Spontaneous Speech

Abstract: We investigated the effectiveness of teaching parents of 3 autistic boys to use a time delay procedure to increase their children's appropriate spontaneous speech in several naturally occurring daily settings (e.g., saying "good morning" in the morning). Generalization across settings and within settings across persons and locations was assessed. Variation in the children's spontaneous speech was also assessed. In addition procedural errors in the parents' use of time delay were calculated. Results indicated t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
80
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
80
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the parents continued the treatment for many more hours each week. Positive results of parent-delivered treatment is a consistent finding in the autism literature (Howlin & Rutter, 1989;Harris, Wolchik & Weitz, 1981;Laski, Charlop& Schreibman, 1988;Charlop & Trasowech, 1991). Finally, both therapies involved interventions very carefully fitted to children's current level of understanding, and delivered in a fairly structured format that emphasized child intentional communication and child initiative.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Thus, the parents continued the treatment for many more hours each week. Positive results of parent-delivered treatment is a consistent finding in the autism literature (Howlin & Rutter, 1989;Harris, Wolchik & Weitz, 1981;Laski, Charlop& Schreibman, 1988;Charlop & Trasowech, 1991). Finally, both therapies involved interventions very carefully fitted to children's current level of understanding, and delivered in a fairly structured format that emphasized child intentional communication and child initiative.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…This was influenced directly by the work by Skinner (1968Skinner ( /1972. The discrete trial teaching procedure (DTT), which greatly defines the interventions at LAPITEA has been documented along the years in several manuals based on scientific research concerning developmental delays (Alwell, Hunt, Goetz, & Sailor, 1989;Barbera, 2007;Charlop-Christy & Carpenter, 2000;Charlop, Schreibman & Thibodeau, 1985;Charlop & Trasowech, 1991;Charlop & Walsh, 1986;Gee, Graham, Goetz, Oshima, & Yoshioka, 1991;Greer & Ross, 2008;Matos, 2016;Richman, 2001;Sundberg & Partington, 1998) and is based on givingseveral opportunities to respond (massed trials). However, the D. C. de Matos, P. G. S. de Matos Psychology need to conduct both DTT in a more structured environment as well as more naturalistic teaching during the day-to-day of individuals with autism in less restricted environments is advised (Sundberg & Partington, 1998).…”
Section: C De Matos P G S De Matos Psychologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naturalistic instruction involves the use of naturally reinforcing stimuli and increased likelihood of generalisation. However, in research on spontaneity in children with autism, a greater number of teaching opportunities were required for acquisition within naturalistic contexts [13] than within intensive intervention contexts (e.g. REF 6).…”
Section: Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…REF 12). Naturalistic teaching strategies (i.e., intervention implemented during naturally occurring routines) have also been utilised to teach spontaneous communication to children with autism [13] . Two studies addressing spontaneous communication in children with Down syndrome also utilised naturalistic teaching strategies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%