2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2021.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing epilepsy-related mortality: A multiple causes of death study in Northern Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“… [41] However, the latter strategy is likely to offer a more representative picture of a population as it is likely to include data from areas where resources may have been limited. Epilepsy-related death: We defined epilepsy-related death using the same ICD-10 coding strategy as other authors of epilepsy-related death studies that use routine data, [46] , [47] , [48] which is also the same strategy used by NRS and the ONS to capture epilepsy-related death when reporting the UK's mandatory national mortality statistics, [49] , [50] , [51] and the same coding strategy used by the WHO to identify epilepsy in their mortality database. [52] This strategy uses codes G40–41 (epilepsy and/or status epilepticus) listed as an underlying or contributory cause of death within death records to denote epilepsy-related death.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… [41] However, the latter strategy is likely to offer a more representative picture of a population as it is likely to include data from areas where resources may have been limited. Epilepsy-related death: We defined epilepsy-related death using the same ICD-10 coding strategy as other authors of epilepsy-related death studies that use routine data, [46] , [47] , [48] which is also the same strategy used by NRS and the ONS to capture epilepsy-related death when reporting the UK's mandatory national mortality statistics, [49] , [50] , [51] and the same coding strategy used by the WHO to identify epilepsy in their mortality database. [52] This strategy uses codes G40–41 (epilepsy and/or status epilepticus) listed as an underlying or contributory cause of death within death records to denote epilepsy-related death.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed a sample size calculation for each outcome based on our previous methodology [33]. We used prevalence figures for each outcome from prior literature [9,18], supported by our pre-submission CPRD feasibility search. Logistic regression modelling assumptions (i) The models have a predictive performance of either Nagelkerke's R 2 of 15% or achieve at least a c-statistic of 0.6 (whichever leads to higher sample size to give a conservative estimate).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Based on a seizure-related ED or hospital admissions prevalence of 8.8% [9], developing a logistic regression model for this outcome will require a minimum sample size of 44,750 if the model achieves at least a c-statistic of 0.6, or 6,430 if the model achieves a Nagelkerke's R 2 of 15%. B Based on an epilepsy-related deaths prevalence of 15.4% [9,18], developing a logistic regression model for this outcome will require a minimum sample size of 27,528 if the model achieves at least a c-statistic of 0.6, or 4,951 if the model achieves a Nagelkerke's R 2 of 15%.…”
Section: Outcomes Based These Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations