2014
DOI: 10.3357/asem.3993.2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing Humidity Affects Thermoregulation During Low-Intensity Exercise in Women

Abstract: Women exercising at low intensities in 35°C experienced most statistically significant physiological changes after 70RH. As H and Ereq remained constant across trials, heat storage increased with each 15% rise in RH because dry and respiratory heat losses minimally offset decreased E. Higher Tre, Tsk, and resultantly higher sweat rates reflected heat storage increases as E decreased in each trial. Overall, at 35°C Ta, we found women exercising for 90 min at low intensities remained at safe rectal temperatures … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was later confirmed in female subjects (Moyen et al, 2014b). The results of Moyen et al on exercising male (Moyen et al, 2014a) and female (Moyen et al, 2014b) subjects confirmed the earlier findings in resting human subjects of Bebner et al (1958), who concluded that below a critical ambient humidity, when the skin is not completely wet, the rate of evaporative heat loss depends predominantly on the rate of sweating resulting from the metabolic rate and ambient heat load. Bebner et al (1958) determined this critical relative humidity to be 60% at 40°C (p H2O = 33.2 mmHg), and 83% at 36°C (p H2O = 37.0 mmHg).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…This was later confirmed in female subjects (Moyen et al, 2014b). The results of Moyen et al on exercising male (Moyen et al, 2014a) and female (Moyen et al, 2014b) subjects confirmed the earlier findings in resting human subjects of Bebner et al (1958), who concluded that below a critical ambient humidity, when the skin is not completely wet, the rate of evaporative heat loss depends predominantly on the rate of sweating resulting from the metabolic rate and ambient heat load. Bebner et al (1958) determined this critical relative humidity to be 60% at 40°C (p H2O = 33.2 mmHg), and 83% at 36°C (p H2O = 37.0 mmHg).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Experimental studies have found that lower humidity improve cardiorespiratory, thermoregulatory, and perceptual responses during cargo transport [39][40][41]. Additionally, maximum evaporative capacity and heat loss ability gradually decrease as relative humidity increases [40,41]. All these results demonstrate that the estimates of temperature and humidity increase for the coming years due to climate change may negatively affect physical activity practice, particularly in tropical climate countries [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In our study, encouraging climate conditions-temperatures from 21 to 31 • C, relative humidity from 65% to 85%, more hours of sun/year, as well as moderate rainfall-were all associated with a higher prevalence of regular physical activity practice, particularly in men. Experimental studies have found that lower humidity improve cardiorespiratory, thermoregulatory, and perceptual responses during cargo transport [39][40][41]. Additionally, maximum evaporative capacity and heat loss ability gradually decrease as relative humidity increases [40,41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MER garments accumulate sweat within the fabric, and in combination with long lasting cutaneous vasodilation after exercise in women, MER rather than PES garments were associated with greater cooling rate and shivering sensations during recovery. According to Moyen et al (2014) , increases in RH also increase sweating rates, so we hypothesize that the MER garments, which cover the body with absorbed sweat, induced an effect similar to a humid environment. Because of that, the relative sweating rates were higher when wearing MER garment sets during exercise compared with the PES sets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%