2021
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-810023/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing Motor Cortex Activation During Grasping Via Novel Robotic Mirror Hand Therapy: A Pilot fNIRS Study

Abstract: Background: Mirror therapy (MT) has been used for functional recovery of the affected hand by providing the mirrored image of the unaffected hand movement, which induces neural activation of the contralateral cortical hemisphere. Recently, many wearable robots assisting the movement of the hand have been developed, and several studies have proposed robotic mirror therapy (RMT) that provides mirrored movements of the unaffected hand on the affected hand with the robot controlled by electromyography or posture o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Block Averaging analysis utilizes the HbO (used in this study) and HbR (not used in this study) while the GLM analysis ts HbO and HbR data to a model of an expected response (i.e., canonical or gamma function), which produces data in the form of a change in HbO and a change in HbR from the expected response. HbO and changes in HbO were reported in the current manuscript as HbO is more sensitive than HbR to changes in hemodynamic response and has been done in previous laterality index analyses (Huppert, Hoge et al 2006, Kim, Lee et al 2022.…”
Section: The Differences Between the Glm And Block Averaging Analysesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Block Averaging analysis utilizes the HbO (used in this study) and HbR (not used in this study) while the GLM analysis ts HbO and HbR data to a model of an expected response (i.e., canonical or gamma function), which produces data in the form of a change in HbO and a change in HbR from the expected response. HbO and changes in HbO were reported in the current manuscript as HbO is more sensitive than HbR to changes in hemodynamic response and has been done in previous laterality index analyses (Huppert, Hoge et al 2006, Kim, Lee et al 2022.…”
Section: The Differences Between the Glm And Block Averaging Analysesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Nishiyori, Bisconti et al 2016). The three formulas under the criterion of Ipsilateral vs. Contralateral did account for handedness and thus the formulas will change based on the hand performing the task(Kim, Lee et al 2022). The LI normalizes cortical activation differences between channels, thereby revealing which hemisphere experience a larger change during the task.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The portability of fNIRS amplifies its utility, extending its reach from clinical domains to field studies, fostering flexibility in research endeavors. This modality is used in locomotory and ambulatory studies including yoga, [31] meditation, [32] robotic [33] and emotional [34] therapies. fNIRS is a virtuoso in unveiling the intricacies of deep brain structures that often evade other neuroimaging methodologies.…”
Section: Functional-near Infrared Spectroscopy (Fnirs)mentioning
confidence: 99%