2017
DOI: 10.1007/s40120-017-0069-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing Precision of Clinical Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease Using a Combined Algorithm Incorporating Clinical and Novel Biomarker Data

Abstract: Establishing the in vivo diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) or other dementias relies on clinical criteria; however, the accuracy of these criteria can be limited. The diagnostic accuracy is 77% for a clinical diagnosis of AD, even among experts. We performed a review through PubMed of articles related to specific diagnostic modalities, including APOE genotyping, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) testing, fludeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomography (PET), amyloid PET, tau PET, computed tomography (CT), single… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study has several limitations. First, our causal estimates may be affected by several factors; horizontal pleiotropy, which was not detected by the applied MR sensitivity analysis methods 71 , and the possibility of misclassified LOAD cases 72, 73 . Unlike the balanced or positive bias induced by horizontal pleiotropy, the misclassified cases in the outcome may lead our results toward null.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study has several limitations. First, our causal estimates may be affected by several factors; horizontal pleiotropy, which was not detected by the applied MR sensitivity analysis methods 71 , and the possibility of misclassified LOAD cases 72, 73 . Unlike the balanced or positive bias induced by horizontal pleiotropy, the misclassified cases in the outcome may lead our results toward null.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this scenario, the most-common types of neuroimaging techniques used to diagnose AD are single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), positron emission tomography (PET), 4 and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). 5,6 Although the former two need the administration of a radioactive imaging agents into a patient, the latter, despite being noninvasive, is quite expensive and cannot detect early stages of the disease when development starts long before any noticeable decrease in hippocampal volume or deposition of plaques and tau tangles 7,8 ). Therefore, the search for new and reliable possible biomarkers in AD is still an open and widely investigated field.…”
Section: Alzheimer's Disease: Early Diagnosis and Cure Wantedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, if diagnosis is exclusively based on cognitive tests, then it cannot easily distinguish AD from mild cognitive impairment or normal aging, and thus the need for neuroimaging arises. In this scenario, the most‐common types of neuroimaging techniques used to diagnose AD are single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), positron emission tomography (PET), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) . Although the former two need the administration of a radioactive imaging agents into a patient, the latter, despite being noninvasive, is quite expensive and cannot detect early stages of the disease when development starts long before any noticeable decrease in hippocampal volume or deposition of plaques and tau tangles).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently there has been a shift to look at pathologic tau in the progression of AD. It is the location and amount of tau found on autopsy in AD subjects that correlates best with stage and severity of symptomatology, not the amyloid plaque [14]. As far back as 1963, such tangles were noted to be composed of filaments with a diameter of approximately 10 nm that have come to be known as paired helical filaments (PHF) [15].…”
Section: Current Understanding Of Admentioning
confidence: 99%