2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.09.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing Pt methanol oxidation reaction activity and durability with a titanium molybdenum nitride catalyst support

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Electrochemically active specific surface areas (ECSA) were analyzed by the oxidation of a CO monolayer, assuming 420 µC cm −2 . Standardization of the real Pt mass by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP‐AES), 3D Pt‐g‐C 3 N 4 ‐rGO exhibits an ECSA value of 80.3 m 2 g −1 , which is far higher than that those of Pt‐g‐C 3 N 4 ‐rGO‐NS (72.2 m 2 g −1 ), Pt‐rGO (68.7 m 2 g −1 ), Pt‐CNT (61.3 m 2 g −1 ), Pt‐AC (44 m 2 g −1 ), and recent state‐of‐the‐art Pt‐based nanocatalysts including Pt‐Ni 2 P/C (69.34 m 2 g −1 ), Pt‐Pd alloy nanoflowers (18.56 m 2 g −1 ), Pd‐Pt nanosheres/RGO (68.1 m 2 g −1 ), Pt/Ti 0.8 Mo 0.2 N (54.9 m 2 g −1 ), Pt nanowires/Vulcan (76.7 m 2 g −1 ), Pt/ionic liquid/CNT (67.6 m 2 g −1 ), etc. This suggests that 3D Pt‐g‐C 3 N 4 ‐rGO not only possesses plenty of catalytically active sites, but also provides more electrochemically accessible surface, which are conducive to electrocatalytic reactions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrochemically active specific surface areas (ECSA) were analyzed by the oxidation of a CO monolayer, assuming 420 µC cm −2 . Standardization of the real Pt mass by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP‐AES), 3D Pt‐g‐C 3 N 4 ‐rGO exhibits an ECSA value of 80.3 m 2 g −1 , which is far higher than that those of Pt‐g‐C 3 N 4 ‐rGO‐NS (72.2 m 2 g −1 ), Pt‐rGO (68.7 m 2 g −1 ), Pt‐CNT (61.3 m 2 g −1 ), Pt‐AC (44 m 2 g −1 ), and recent state‐of‐the‐art Pt‐based nanocatalysts including Pt‐Ni 2 P/C (69.34 m 2 g −1 ), Pt‐Pd alloy nanoflowers (18.56 m 2 g −1 ), Pd‐Pt nanosheres/RGO (68.1 m 2 g −1 ), Pt/Ti 0.8 Mo 0.2 N (54.9 m 2 g −1 ), Pt nanowires/Vulcan (76.7 m 2 g −1 ), Pt/ionic liquid/CNT (67.6 m 2 g −1 ), etc. This suggests that 3D Pt‐g‐C 3 N 4 ‐rGO not only possesses plenty of catalytically active sites, but also provides more electrochemically accessible surface, which are conducive to electrocatalytic reactions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From Figure 5f there can also be found different crystal phases that overlap together. This is evidence that BTMNs were formed from two different TMNs and shows both their advantages with well-dispersed nanoparticles of BTMNs [24]. Figure S2 shown the particles shape of three samples after the reaction.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Fresh and Used Samplesmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…obtained activities in the range of 25–100 mA mg Pt −1 with Pt‐AlOOH‐SiO 2 /graphene hybrid nanomaterials of different composition . A catalyst that consisted of Pt nanoparticles supported on titanium nitride was investigated by Xiao et al . They reported an activity of 64.92 mA mg Pt −1 for Pt/TiNi catalyst at 0.6 V (vs. Ag/AgCl).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%