We read the article by Carpenter et al 1 with interest because it provides crucial information on the trends in pediatric pulmonary embolism (PPE) in the United States. Similarly, we conducted an analysis of the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database (initiated prior to the aforementioned publication), with an aim to identify features associated with mortality and recurrent PPE. PHIS is an administrative database that contains clinical and resource utilization data for inpatients from 45 not-for-profit tertiary-care hospitals throughout the United States. Participating hospitals provide discharge data, including patient demographic data, diagnoses, and procedure codes. 2 Carpenter et al 1 analyzed children up to 18 years of age in the PHIS database from 2001 to 2014, whereas we analyzed the PHIS database between 2004 and 2017 and used the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) (415.11, 415.12, 415.13, 415.19) and ICD-10 (I26.01, I26.02, I26.09, I26.90, I26.92, I26.99) diagnostic codes (PHIS began using ICD-10 codes in 2015). Additionally, we included patients ,21 years of age based on the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development pediatric age definition. 3 Although Carpenter et al 1 evaluated pulmonary embolism (PE) rate and compared it with venous thromboembolism (VTE) discharges and all hospital discharges, for other variables (eg, sex, mortality, CCC risk factors for recurrence) they primarily compared PE patients with VTE patients. We analyzed the PPE cohort and compared demographics of this cohort with all hospital admissions. Additionally, we evaluated risk factors for recurrent PE (subsequent admission with an ICD code for PE) and mortality within 2 years of the index PE event, using univariate analysis and multivariate analysis with a Cox proportionate hazards model. Consequently, we identified additional risk factors and characterizations for PPE that we believe are informative and worth reporting.