2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2013.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing sensitivity of pulse EPR experiments using echo train detection schemes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
66
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that this addition of echoes in our experiments would be practically different than the detection schemes proposed in [23] because in our case the pulse train is the method itself and not only its detection component. Nevertheless, both approaches lead to SNR gain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Note that this addition of echoes in our experiments would be practically different than the detection schemes proposed in [23] because in our case the pulse train is the method itself and not only its detection component. Nevertheless, both approaches lead to SNR gain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The method presented here could be combined with the idea of multiple echo detection during a train of refocusing π pulses for increasing the signal/noise ratio (SNR), as was recently shown for a variety of pulse EPR experiments [23]. This would include the addition of all (or selected) relevant refocused echoes for a given train of N pulses, provided that the corresponding ESEEM spectra are not distorted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ENDOR measurements were performed on a home-built W-band (94.9 GHz) spectrometer (Goldfarb et al, 2008; Mentink-Vigier et al, 2013) at a temperature of 10 K; for all the experiments the magnetic field was set at the center of the |m S , m I > = |−1/2, −3/2> ➔ |+1/2, −3/2> line (second peak of the 55 Mn ( I = 5/2) hyperfine sextet) at 3.374 T (ν L ( 1 H) = 143.65 MHz). The standard Davies ENDOR sequence π mw – T – t RF – T – π/2 mw – τ – π mw – τ – echo (Davies, 1974) was used, in which the echo intensity is monitored as a function of the RF (radio frequency).…”
Section: Methods Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The T delay, added in order to prevent overlap between the ring-down phenomena following the pulses, was set to T = 1 μs; the delay for the Hahn echo generation sequence was set to τ = 1 μs. The pulse sequence was supplemented with echo train acquisition in order to increase the sensitivity (Mentink-Vigier et al, 2013). …”
Section: Methods Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%