2012
DOI: 10.3390/rs4030726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing Spatial Detail of Burned Scar Maps Using IRS‑AWiFS Data for Mediterranean Europe

Abstract: Abstract:A two stage burned scar detection approach is applied to produce a burned scar map for Mediterranean Europe using IRS-AWiFS imagery acquired at the end of the 2009 fire season. The first stage identified burned scar seeds based on a learning algorithm (Artificial Neural Network) coupled with a bootstrap aggregation process. The second stage implemented a region growing process to extend the area of the burned scars. Several ancillary datasets were used for the accuracy assessment and a final visual ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…of early-season fires is captured from available images acquired at mid-to end-season. Moreover, an increase in the number of available images significantly increases the ability to capture fires because the chances of getting full, cloud-free coverage of the area of interest increase (Sedano et al, 2012) and the large number of acquisitions assists in reducing the between-acquisition period, thus allowing the capture of signals of relatively small fires that otherwise would have faded due to vegetation recovery, particularly in areas reflecting increased summer-precipitation totals (Sedano et al, 2012). Similar arguments also apply for the failure of 'date of the last image' to enter the models as a significant explanatory variable.…”
Section: Modelling the Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…of early-season fires is captured from available images acquired at mid-to end-season. Moreover, an increase in the number of available images significantly increases the ability to capture fires because the chances of getting full, cloud-free coverage of the area of interest increase (Sedano et al, 2012) and the large number of acquisitions assists in reducing the between-acquisition period, thus allowing the capture of signals of relatively small fires that otherwise would have faded due to vegetation recovery, particularly in areas reflecting increased summer-precipitation totals (Sedano et al, 2012). Similar arguments also apply for the failure of 'date of the last image' to enter the models as a significant explanatory variable.…”
Section: Modelling the Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, date of image acquisition affects the success of the assessment of burn severity (Hudak et al, 2007). Another parameter that contributes to the underestimation of burned scars is the presence of fires after the image acquisition (Sedano, Kempeneers, Strobl, McInerney, & San Miguel, 2012), revealing the importance of the end-date acquisition. The relative importance of each of the above-mentioned parameters in fire scar mapping has not yet been extensively evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate information of natural and human influences about fire regimes are critical to prevent future events and restore areas already affected. Remote sensing is one of the main techniques for assessing the damage effects from fire events because of its synoptic nature, cost-efficiency, rapid wildfire damage assessments, and acquisition of long-term information about ecosystem dynamics [1][2][3]. Several remote sensing techniques have been proposed to assess burned areas [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, to our knowledge, very few validation studies have established the accuracy at which estimates of burnt area by those products is provided. Such studies have been based primarily on performing either direct comparisons with higherresolution data or intercomparisons between the different datasets (Boschetti et al, 2004Silva et al, 2005;Roy et al, 2008;Roy and Boschetti, 2009;Sedano et al, 2012), despite the fact that it is indispensable to objectively characterise the accuracy of global datasets and their limitations for providing a measure of quality of a dataset, and for understanding their errors and the potential implications in different applications (Silva et al, 2005). What is more, policy and management requests of satellite products for different types of applications place a high priority on providing statements about their accuracy (Morisette et al, 2006).…”
Section: P Kalivas Et Al: An Intercomparison Of Burnt Area Estimmentioning
confidence: 99%